A Review of Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, and Robots Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory

被引:1
作者
Matthews, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
Su, Runkun [3 ]
Yonish, Lindsey [4 ]
Mcclean, Shawn [2 ]
Koopman, Joel [4 ]
Yam, Kai Chi [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; algorithms; robots; stakeholder theory; fourth industrial revolution; intelligent machines; ANTHROPOMORPHISM INCREASES TRUST; DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; VALUE CREATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; TRADE-OFFS; AUTOMATION; AI; MANAGEMENT; AGENTS;
D O I
10.1177/01492063241311855
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the arrival of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, intelligent machines are affecting the daily lives of multiple organizational stakeholders. However, despite the continued expansion of intelligent machines in society, management scholarship has generally lagged, and current frameworks are under-equipped to offer meaningful guidance regarding the intersection of intelligent machines and organizations. We address this issue via a multidisciplinary review and a novel framework of intelligent machines and value creation. First, we discuss the characteristics of intelligent machines (i.e., autonomy, learning, inscrutability, and materiality) and how variation in these characteristics impacts their affordances and, subsequently, the value offered to stakeholders. We also advance the notion of value contingencies, which captures the idea that the value afforded by intelligent machines is conditional and that stakeholders' dispositions and exploitation of intelligent machines must be considered when assessing value creation. Building on our framework, we offer recommendations for future research. Overall, we forward the literature by showcasing how intelligent machines often create both advantages and disadvantages for stakeholders and demonstrate how practitioners, policymakers, and management scholars may consider this moving forward.
引用
收藏
页数:50
相关论文
共 353 条
  • [1] HOW AI-BASED SYSTEMS CAN INDUCE REFLECTIONS: THE CASE OF AI-AUGMENTED DIAGNOSTIC WORK
    Abdel-Karim, Benjamin M.
    Pfeuffer, Nicolas
    Carl, K. Valerie
    Hinz, Oliver
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2023, 47 (04) : 1395 - 1423
  • [2] Are they coming for us? Industrial robots and the mental health of workers
    Abeliansky, Ana Lucia
    Beulmann, Matthias
    Prettner, Klaus
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2024, 53 (03)
  • [3] Value creation or value destruction: Conceptualizing the experiential nature of value-in-use
    Abid, Muhammad Farrukh
    Shamim, Amjad
    Khan, Zaheen
    Khan, Imran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 21 (03) : 583 - 601
  • [4] MANAGERIAL FADS AND FASHIONS - THE DIFFUSION AND REJECTION OF INNOVATIONS
    ABRAHAMSON, E
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1991, 16 (03) : 586 - 612
  • [5] TASKS, AUTOMATION, AND THE RISE IN US WAGE INEQUALITY
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Restrepo, Pascual
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2022, 90 (05) : 1973 - 2016
  • [6] Demographics and Automation
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Restrepo, Pascual
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2022, 89 (01) : 1 - 44
  • [7] Human Versus Automated Sales Agents: How and Why Customer Responses Shift Across Sales Stages
    Adam, Martin
    Roethke, Konstantin
    Benlian, Alexander
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (03) : 1148 - 1168
  • [8] SustAInable Employability: Sustainable Employability in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Adiasto, Krisna
    [J]. GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 49 (06) : 1338 - 1348
  • [9] Agrawal A., 2022, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
  • [10] WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET? ENHANCING METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
    Aguinis, Herman
    Ramani, Ravi S.
    Alabduljader, Nawaf
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (01) : 83 - 110