Impact of mineral nutrition and biopriming on crop performance, energetics, and the carbon footprint in rainfed castor bean (Ricinus communis L.)

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Revappa Mohan [1 ]
Madival, Yamanura [1 ]
Nagangoudar, Mahantesh Basangouda [1 ]
Narayanappa, Nagesha [1 ]
Ranganath, Gopalaswamy [1 ]
Ranganatha, Sugganahalli Channappa [1 ]
Paramesh, Venkatesh [2 ]
Jinger, Dinesh [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Sci, Bengaluru 560065, Karnataka, India
[2] ICAR Cent Coastal Agr Res Inst, Old Goa 403402, Goa, India
[3] Indian Inst Soil & Water Conservat, ICAR, Res Ctr Vasad, Anand 388306, Gujarat, India
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
Biofertilizer; Economics; Nutrient use efficiency; Partial factor productivity; Resource use efficiency; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; USE EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; CONSERVATION; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100370
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Suboptimal nutrition augmented by soil moisture stress adversely impacts crop performance in rainfed agriculture. At the same situation, conjunctive use of bioinoculants with mineral nutrients alleviates moisture stress and amplifies nutrient availability that improves the crop performance. With this background, a four-year fixed plot field experiment was conducted to determine the impact of mineral nutrition and biopriming on the productivity, economics, energetics, and carbon (C) footprint in rainfed castor. Three fertilizer rates and five bioinoculants were evaluated in a split-plot design with three replications. The result revealed that, application of recommended rate of fertilizer (RRF) recorded similar to 22.13 % and 82.49 % higher yields than 75 % and 50 % RRF, respectively. The highest gross returns (Indian Rupee 80,412 ha(-1)), net returns (Indian Rupee 50,511 ha(-1)) and benefit-cost ratios (2.68) were also found higher with RRF. Likewise, plots applied with RRF even increased the seed oil content (50.9 %), oil productivity (722 kg ha(-1)), and rain-water use efficiency (1.60 kg ha(-1) mm(-1)). The plots treated with RRF required in 8.12-18.64 % higher energy input (12,275 MJ ha(-1)) over 75 % and 50 % RRF, respectively. Furthermore, RRF appeared to be convincing by recording significantly highest C-outputs (1,582 kg CE ha(-1)) and also other C quotients over its counterparts. Among the binoculants, seed priming with Bacillus megaterium and Pseudomonas fluorescens surpassed the productivity potential of other bioinoculants. Bioinoculants being energy diffident inputs they did not showed significant variation in energy input, while they showed significant variation in energy output. The energy output of castor bioprimed with B. megaterium (47,011 MJ ha(-1)) surpassed the remaining bioinoculants. Again, B. megaterium recorded significantly lower C-footprint (0.22 kg CE kg castor seed yield(-1)) while it displayed highest C-outputs (1,556 kg CE ha(-1)), C-efficiencies (4.53 kg kg(-1) CE), net C-gains (1,278 kg CE ha(-1)), and C-sustainability index (4.60). Consequently, the application of RRF, i.e., 40-40-20 kg N-P2O5-K2O ha(-1,) along with the biopriming of B.megaterium appeared to be promising in enhancing productivity, economic returns, and resource use efficiency besides optimizing energy flow and C footprint in rainfed castor bean cultivation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adenosine stimulates anabolic metabolism in developing castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) cotyledons
    Martin Flörchinger
    Marc Zimmermann
    Michaela Traub
    H. Ekkehard Neuhaus
    Torsten Möhlmann
    Planta, 2006, 223 : 340 - 348
  • [22] Films based on castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) proteins crosslinked with glutaraldehyde and glyoxal
    Makishi, G. L. A.
    Lacerda, R. S.
    Bittante, A. M. Q. B.
    Chambi, H. N. M.
    Costa, P. A.
    Gomide, C. A.
    Carvalho, R. A.
    Sobral, P. J. A.
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2013, 50 : 375 - 382
  • [23] Genetic Diversity of Castor Bean (Ricinus communis L.) Revealed by ISSR and RAPD Markers
    Kim, HyokChol
    Lei, Pei
    Wang, Aizhi
    Liu, Shuo
    Zhao, Yong
    Huang, Fenglan
    Yu, Zhenliang
    Zhu, Guoli
    He, Zhibiao
    Tan, Deyun
    Wang, Hongwei
    Meng, Fanjuan
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [24] Recurrent selection efficiency for stature reduction of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) plants
    de Oliveira, Inocencio Junior
    Zanotto, Mauricio Dutra
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2008, 32 (04): : 1107 - 1112
  • [25] Culture media on in vitro development of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) stem tips
    Bertozzo, Fernanda
    Machado, Isaac Stringueta
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2010, 34 (06): : 1477 - 1482
  • [26] Intraspecific variation within Castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) based on chloroplast genomes
    Muraguri, Sammy
    Xu, Wei
    Chapman, Mark
    Muchugi, Alice
    Oluwaniyi, Adejobi
    Oyebanji, Oyetola
    Liu, Aizhong
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2020, 155
  • [27] Accumulation and distribution of copper in castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) callus cultures: in vitro
    Huang, Guoyong
    Jin, Yong
    Zheng, Jin
    Kang, Wei
    Hu, Hongqing
    Liu, Yonghong
    Zou, Tao
    PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 2017, 128 (01) : 177 - 186
  • [28] Bloom and whitefly resistance in Castor bean (Ricinus communis L.): a genetic and linkage analysis
    Haran, R. Hari
    Venkatachalam, S. R.
    Arutchenthil, P.
    Saravanan, P. A.
    Natarajan, S. K.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2025, 72 (03) : 3683 - 3697
  • [29] Sustainable Castor Bean Biodiesel Through Ricinus communis L. Lipase Extract Catalysis
    Gonzalez Rivas, Alejandro
    Avila Vazquez, Veronica
    Aguilera Flores, Miguel Mauricio
    Viviana Cerrillo-Rojas, Gloria
    Christian Correa-Aguado, Hans
    APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 195 (02) : 1297 - 1318
  • [30] In vitro micropropagation through cotyledonary node culture of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.)
    Alam, Iftekhar
    Sharmin, Shamima Akhtar
    Mondal, Sanjoy Chandra
    Alam, Md. Jahangir
    Khalekuzzaman, Muhammad
    Anisuzzaman, M.
    Alam, Mohammad Firoz
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 2010, 4 (02) : 81 - 84