Collaborative Learning Groupings Incorporating Deep Knowledge Tracing Optimization Strategies

被引:0
作者
Li, Haojun [1 ]
Chen, Yaohan [1 ]
Liao, Weixia [1 ]
Wang, Xuhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Educ, 288 Liuhe Rd, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
collaborative learning; knowledge mastery state diagnosis; knowledge tracing; Q matrix;
D O I
10.3390/app15052692
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Effective grouping in collaborative learning is crucial for enhancing the efficiency of collaborative learning. A well-structured collaborative learning group can significantly enhance the learning effectiveness of both individuals and group members. However, the current approaches to collaborative learning grouping often lack a thorough examination of students' knowledge-level characteristics, thereby failing to ensure that the knowledge structures of group members complement each other. Therefore, a collaborative learning grouping method incorporating the optimization strategy of deep knowledge tracking is proposed. Firstly, the optimized deep knowledge tracking (DKVMN-EKC) model is used to model the knowledge state of learners to obtain the degree of knowledge mastery of learners, and then the K-means method is used to similarly cluster all learners, and finally, the learners of different clusters are assigned to suitable learning groups according to the principle of heterogeneity of grouping. Extensive experiments have demonstrated that DKVMN-EKC can precisely model students' knowledge mastery levels and that the proposed approach facilitates effective grouping at the level of students' knowledge structures, thereby ensuring fairer and more heterogeneous grouping results. This approach fosters positive interactions among students, enabling them to learn from one another and effectively improve their understanding of various knowledge points.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Smith K.A., Cooperative learning: Effective teamwork for engineering classrooms, Proceedings of the Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century, 1
  • [2] Hu X.Y., Li Y.L., Xu X.H., Practical Strategies for Optimizing Group Learning Effects: A Case Study of Educational Communication Course, 1, (2009)
  • [3] Li Z.J., Qiu D.F., Student’s self-regulated learning: The conditions and strategies of teaching, Glob. Educ, 1, pp. 47-57, (2017)
  • [4] Piech C., Bassen J., Huang J., Ganguli S., Sahami M., Guibas L.J., Sohl-Dickstein J., Deep knowledge tracing, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, 28, (2015)
  • [5] Lindow J.A., Wilkinson L.C., Peterson P.L., Antecedents and consequences of verbal disagreements during small-group learning, J. Educ. Psychol, 77, pp. 658-667, (1985)
  • [6] Barth-Cohen L.A., Wittmann M.C., Aligning coordination class theory with a new context: Applying a theory of individual learning to group learning, Sci. Educ, 101, pp. 333-363, (2017)
  • [7] Molina A.I., Arroyo Y., Lacave C., Redondo M.A., Learn-CIAN: A visual language for the modelling of group learning processes, Br. J. Educ. Technol, 49, pp. 1096-1112, (2018)
  • [8] Liu Y., Liu Q., Wu R., Chen E., Hu G., Collaborative Learning Team Formation: ACognitive Modeling Perspective, Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications
  • [9] Learning in Teams: A Tutor Guide, (1995)
  • [10] Ounnas A., Davis H., Millard D., A framework for semantic group formation, Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 34-38