Comparison of Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope with the C-MAC and Tuoren Videolaryngoscopes in Facilitating Endotracheal Intubation during Uninterrupted Manual Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Rajender [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [2 ]
Kumar, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
Airway management; Cardiac arrest; Direct laryngoscopy; Endotracheal intubation; Videolaryngoscope; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Videolaryngoscopes (VLS) frequently provide superior views of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL), especially during unexpected difficult airways. Chest compressions during attempts to intubate the trachea make it a difficult situation. Although VLS have been compared with DL for intubation during resuscitation, there is a paucity of literature comparing VLS with integrated screen and distant screen with DL during continued manual chest compressions. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover observational manikin study. A total of 20 participants performed intubation, while manual chest compression was continuing, with each of the three devices on six occasions, but in different, randomized order. The primary outcome parameter was the total time taken for successful intubation. The secondary outcome criteria included the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and the device preference. Results: Time taken for successful intubation and ease of intubation were significantly better with C-MAC VLS and DL as compared with Tuoren VLS (C-MAC vs Tuoren p < 0.000 for both; DL vs Tuoren p < 0.001 for time and p = 0.021 for ease). There was no significant difference between C-MAC and DL (p = 1.0 for time and p = 0.69 for ease). There was no significant difference with regard to the number of attempts for successful intubation with any of these devices (p = 0.310). C-MAC was the most and Tuoren was the least preferred device. Conclusion: C-MAC VLS and Macintosh DL are significantly easier to use and require significantly less time to achieve successful intubation as compared with the Tuoren VLS during continued manual chest compression. Among the devices tested, C-MAC VLS was the most preferred for endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted manual chest compressions.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 116
页数:4
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts by novice physicians between the Macintosh direct laryngoscope, Airway Scope and C-MAC PM: a high-fidelity simulator-based study
    Nakanishi, Taizo
    Shiga, Takashi
    Homma, Yosuke
    Koyama, Yasuaki
    Goto, Tadahiro
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (05):
  • [42] Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
    Seo, Kwon Hui
    Kim, Kyung Mi
    John, Hyunji
    Jun, Joo Hyun
    Han, Minsoo
    Kim, Soyoun
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [43] Comparison of Glidescope Core, C-MAC Miller and conventional Miller laryngoscope for difficult airway management by anesthetists with limited and extensive experience in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence: A randomized crossover manikin study
    Moritz, Andreas
    Holzhauser, Luise
    Fuchte, Tobias
    Kremer, Sven
    Schmidt, Joachim
    Irouschek, Andrea
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [44] Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
    Kwon Hui Seo
    Kyung Mi Kim
    Hyunji John
    Joo Hyun Jun
    Minsoo Han
    Soyoun Kim
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [45] Comparison of direct intubation and Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T.) for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Randomized manikin study
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Zasko, Piotr
    Bogdanski, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2015, 47 (03) : 195 - 199
  • [46] Comparison of Jaw-Thrust Maneuver and Standard Method for Airway Management with Laryngeal Mask Airway by Paramedics during Chest Compression: A Randomized, Crossover, Manikin Study
    Ozbek, Asim E.
    Sanci, Emre
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (03) : 378 - 382
  • [47] Comparison of dental force applied during endotracheal intubation with hyper-angulated and macintosh-type video laryngoscopy blades used by emergency medicine trainees: A randomized cross-over manikin study
    Karabacak, Ali Riza
    Ozturan, Ibrahim Ulas
    Sefoglu, Omer Faruk
    Dogan, Nurettin Ozgur
    Yaka, Elif
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Pekdemir, Murat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (03): : 151 - +
  • [48] Comparison of Glidescope(R)Go™, King Vision™, Dahlhausen VL, I-View™and Macintosh laryngoscope use during difficult airway management simulation by experienced and inexperienced emergency medical staff: A randomized crossover manikin study
    Moritz, Andreas
    Leonhardt, Veronika
    Prottengeier, Johannes
    Birkholz, Torsten
    Schmidt, Joachim
    Irouschek, Andrea
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):