Comparison of Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope with the C-MAC and Tuoren Videolaryngoscopes in Facilitating Endotracheal Intubation during Uninterrupted Manual Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Rajender [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [2 ]
Kumar, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
Airway management; Cardiac arrest; Direct laryngoscopy; Endotracheal intubation; Videolaryngoscope; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Videolaryngoscopes (VLS) frequently provide superior views of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL), especially during unexpected difficult airways. Chest compressions during attempts to intubate the trachea make it a difficult situation. Although VLS have been compared with DL for intubation during resuscitation, there is a paucity of literature comparing VLS with integrated screen and distant screen with DL during continued manual chest compressions. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover observational manikin study. A total of 20 participants performed intubation, while manual chest compression was continuing, with each of the three devices on six occasions, but in different, randomized order. The primary outcome parameter was the total time taken for successful intubation. The secondary outcome criteria included the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and the device preference. Results: Time taken for successful intubation and ease of intubation were significantly better with C-MAC VLS and DL as compared with Tuoren VLS (C-MAC vs Tuoren p < 0.000 for both; DL vs Tuoren p < 0.001 for time and p = 0.021 for ease). There was no significant difference between C-MAC and DL (p = 1.0 for time and p = 0.69 for ease). There was no significant difference with regard to the number of attempts for successful intubation with any of these devices (p = 0.310). C-MAC was the most and Tuoren was the least preferred device. Conclusion: C-MAC VLS and Macintosh DL are significantly easier to use and require significantly less time to achieve successful intubation as compared with the Tuoren VLS during continued manual chest compression. Among the devices tested, C-MAC VLS was the most preferred for endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted manual chest compressions.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 116
页数:4
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Comparison of conventional C-MAC video laryngoscope guided intubation by anesthesia trainees with and without Frova endotracheal introducer: A randomized clinical trial
    Arasu, Meenupriya
    Rudingwa, Priya
    Satyaprakash, Mv S.
    Panneerselvam, Sakthirajan
    Kuberan, Aswini
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 483 - 488
  • [32] EFFECTS OF USING AN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE INTRODUCER FOR INTUBATION DURING MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSIONS OF A MANIKIN: RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, CROSSOVER STUDY
    Ozbek, Asim Enes
    Halhalli, Huseyin Cahit
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Celik, Emrah
    Ozerol, Hakan
    Sanci, Emre
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [33] GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial
    Huang, Ping
    Zhou, Renlong
    Lu, Zhixing
    Hang, Yannan
    Wang, Shanjuan
    Huang, Zhenling
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [34] GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial
    Ping Huang
    Renlong Zhou
    Zhixing Lu
    Yannan Hang
    Shanjuan Wang
    Zhenling Huang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [35] Randomized comparison of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope, and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization
    Roh, Go Un
    Kwak, Hyun Jeong
    Lee, Kyung Cheon
    Lee, Sun Young
    Kim, Jong Yeop
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2019, 66 (10): : 1213 - 1220
  • [36] A comparison of angled (D-Blade) and Macintosh (C-MAC) videolaryngoscopes for simulated pediatric difficult airway: a randomized single-blind study
    Kus, Alparslan
    Aksu, Can
    Yorukoglu, Hadi Ufuk
    Alparslan, Volkan
    Toker, Kamil
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 52 (01) : 216 - 221
  • [37] Benefits of using an endotracheal tube introducer as an adjunct to a Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation performed by inexperienced doctors during mechanical CPR: A randomized prospective crossover study
    Halhalli, Huseyin Cahit
    Ozbek, Asim Enes
    Celik, Emrah
    Yigit, Yavuz
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Cardak, Muge
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 10 (03): : 182 - 186
  • [38] Comparison of the MultiViewScope Stylet Scope and the direct laryngoscope with the Miller blade for the intubation in normal and difficult pediatric airways: A randomized, crossover, manikin study
    Godai, Kohei
    Moriyama, Takahiro
    Kanmura, Yuichi
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [39] Comparison of endotracheal intubation with Macintosh versus King Vision video laryngoscope using coronavirus disease 2019 barrier box on manikins: A randomized crossover study
    Guru, Satyabrata
    Singh, Neha
    Sahoo, Sangeeta
    Hansda, Upendra
    Mohanty, Chittaranjan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (03): : 149 - 155
  • [40] Comparison between C-MAC and King Vision video laryngoscope (channelled blade) for tracheal intubation in aerosol-prevention intubation box for COVID-19 patients: A manikin-based study
    Kumar, Balbir
    Ratre, Brajesh K.
    Garg, Rakesh
    Meena, Jitendra K.
    Singh, Ram
    Bhatnagar, Sushma
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (03) : 187 - 192