Can ChatGPT pass the Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Board Examination? Turkish orthopedic surgeons versus artificial intelligence

被引:0
|
作者
Pamuk, Cagdas [1 ]
Uyanik, Abdullah Faruk [2 ]
Kuyucu, Ersin [1 ]
Ugurlar, Meric [3 ]
机构
[1] Private Silivri Anadolu Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Prof Dr Cemil Tascioglu City Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Nisantasi Univ, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY | 2025年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT-4o; orthopedics; education; trauma surgery; MACHINE; ARTHROPLASTY;
D O I
10.14744/tjtes.2025.07724
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence has been shown to achieve successful outcomes in various orthopedic qualification examinations worldwide. This study aims to assess the performance of ChatGPT in the written section of the Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Board Examination, compare its results with those of candidates who took the exam, and determine whether ChatGPT is sufficient to achieve a passing score. METHODS: This retrospective observational study evaluated whether ChatGPT achieved a passing grade on 400 publicly available questions from the Turkish orthopedics qualification exam over the past four years. ChatGPT's performance was compared with the mean scores of the candidates who took the exam. RESULTS: A total of 627 candidates participated in the four exams included in the study, of whom 292 (46.5%) passed. ChatGPT received higher scores than 619 (98.7%) of the candidates. In all exams conducted between 2020 and 2023, ChatGPT achieved significantly higher scores than the mean exam success rate (p=0.012, p=0.012, p=0.002, p=0.005, respectively). Of the 400 questions analyzed, 36 (9%) included figures. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT in the Turkish orthopedics proficiency exam. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT demonstrated high success in the Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Board Examination (TOTBE) written exam, achieving higher scores than the vast majority of candidates taking the exam (98.7%). ChatGPT performed well in the first part of the proficiency exam, where only theoretical knowledge is assessed. However, the human factor, which synthesizes both theoretical and practical knowledge, remains essential in daily medical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 315
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] ChatGPT in orthopedics: a narrative review exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in orthopedic practice
    Giorgino, Riccardo
    Alessandri-Bonetti, Mario
    Luca, Andrea
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Rossi, Nicolo
    Peretti, Giuseppe M.
    Mangiavini, Laura
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [2] How does ChatGPT perform on the European Board of Orthopedics and Traumatology examination? A comparative study
    Ulus, Sait Anil
    MEDICINA BALEAR, 2023, 38 (06):
  • [3] Evaluation of ChatGPT's Performance in the Turkish Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Examination
    Yigitbay, Ahmet
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2024, 62 (04): : 243 - 249
  • [4] The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT
    Livberber, Tuba
    Ayvaz, Suheyla
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
  • [5] Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: can Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) pass Section 1 of the Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons (Trauma & Orthopaedics) examination?
    Cuthbert, Rory
    Simpson, Ashley, I
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 99 (1176) : 1110 - 1114
  • [6] Performance of artificial intelligence on Turkish dental specialization exam: can ChatGPT-4.0 and gemini advanced achieve comparable results to humans?
    Sismanoglu, Soner
    Capan, Belen Sirinoglu
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [7] Trends in Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty Among Orthopedic Surgeons Who Take the American Board of Orthopedics Part II Examination
    Pour, Aidin Eslam
    Bradbury, Thomas L.
    Horst, Patrick K.
    Harrast, John J.
    Erens, Greg A.
    Roberson, James R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (07) : 1417 - 1421
  • [8] What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022
    Bisi, Theophile
    Risser, Anthony
    Clavert, Philippe
    Migaud, Henri
    Dartus, Julien
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2023, 109 (08)
  • [9] Performance of artificial intelligence chatbots in sleep medicine certification board exams: ChatGPT versus Google Bard
    Ryan Chin Taw Cheong
    Kenny Peter Pang
    Samit Unadkat
    Venkata Mcneillis
    Andrew Williamson
    Jonathan Joseph
    Premjit Randhawa
    Peter Andrews
    Vinidh Paleri
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2024, 281 : 2137 - 2143
  • [10] Performance of artificial intelligence chatbots in sleep medicine certification board exams: ChatGPT versus Google Bard
    Cheong, Ryan Chin Taw
    Pang, Kenny Peter
    Unadkat, Samit
    Mcneillis, Venkata
    Williamson, Andrew
    Joseph, Jonathan
    Randhawa, Premjit
    Andrews, Peter
    Paleri, Vinidh
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 281 (04) : 2137 - 2143