Physiological and molecular insights into adaptive responses of Vigna marina to drought stress

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yiming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Zhibo [5 ,6 ]
Liu, Guodao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shen, Wenhao [6 ]
Lohani, Neeta [6 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ye, Xiuxu [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Atieno, Mary [7 ]
Thi, Hang Dao [7 ]
Nghia, Nguyen Khoi [8 ]
Hu, An [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yan, Linling [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Huan, Hengfu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Trop Agr Sci CATAS, Trop Crops Genet Resources Inst, Haikou 571101, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Key Lab Trop Crop Breeding, Sanya 572024, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr & Rual Affairs, Key Lab Crop Gene Resources & Germplasm Enhancemen, Haikou 571101, Peoples R China
[4] Key Lab Trop Crops Germplasm Resources Genet Impro, Haikou, Peoples R China
[5] Virginia Tech, Sch Plant & Environm Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[6] Donald Danforth Plant Sci Ctr, Olivette, MO 63132 USA
[7] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Trop Forages Program, Hanoi, Vietnam
[8] Can Tho Univ, Coll Agr, Fac Soil Sci, Can Tho City, Vietnam
来源
GRASS RESEARCH | 2025年 / 5卷
关键词
ABIOTIC STRESS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; GLYCINE BETAINE; PLANT-RESPONSES; SALT TOLERANCE; CROP; EXPRESSION; FLUORESCENCE; PROTEIN; GENES;
D O I
10.48130/grares-0025-0003
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Drought is one of the most challenging environmental stress factors for grassland ecosystems. We evaluated drought responses of beach cowpea (Vigna marina, Vm) using PEG6000 and found that Vm exhibits significantly greater drought tolerance than its close relative, cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, Vu). Vm's superior drought tolerance is linked to increased root activity, enhanced cellular homeostasis, higher osmolyte accumulation, and antioxidant enzyme activity. Additionally, the leaf system of Vm shows an unusual physiological response to drought, maintaining higher stomatal conductance and transpiration rates than Vu, which facilitates water transport and sustains leaf performance under stress. Root transcriptomes that underwent GO enrichment analysis showed significant enrichment genes related to cell wall composition and integrity in Vm, but not in Vu, suggesting a key difference in their drought response. By analyzing differentially expressed homolog genes (DEHGs) under drought conditions, we identified several drought-inducible marker genes including ABIG1, ANAC32, GA2OX1, CIPK15, PP2C49, and DRS1. These genes encode transcription factors, kinases, and antioxidant enzymes, with some involved in the ABA and GA signaling pathways, highlighting the complex mechanisms by which Vm adapts to drought stress. WGCNA identified 22 gene modules in Vm and 10 in Vu, each showing positive or negative associations with drought tolerance based on their correlation with physiological traits. Key DEHGs like LEA3, LOX4, SODC, and a cluster of XTH genes were found in these modules, highlighting distinct molecular responses to drought between the two species. This study uncovers key physiological and molecular mechanisms behind Vm's drought tolerance and provides valuable genetic resources for breeding drought-tolerant crops.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring physiological and molecular dynamics of drought stress responses in plants: challenges and future directions
    Ali, Sajad
    Mir, Rakeeb Ahmad
    Haque, Md Azizul
    Almalki, Mohammed A.
    Alfredan, Mohammad
    Khalifa, Ashraf
    Mahmoudi, Henda
    Shahid, Mohammad
    Tyagi, Anshika
    Mir, Zahoor Ahmad
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2025, 16
  • [32] Effect of dopamine and progesterone on the physiological and molecular responses of tomato seedlings to drought and salt stress
    Akcay, Ufuk Celikkol
    Gencay, Reyhan
    Koc, Fatma Zehra
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [33] The role of nanoparticles in plant biochemical, physiological, and molecular responses under drought stress: A review
    Rasheed, Adnan
    Li, Huijie
    Tahir, Majid M.
    Mahmood, Athar
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Shah, Adnan Noor
    Aslam, Muhammad Talha
    Negm, Sally
    Moustafa, Mahmoud
    Hassan, Muhammad Umair
    Wu, Ziming
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [34] Physiological and molecular responses to drought stress in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.)
    Galeano, Esteban
    Vasconcelos, Tarcisio Sales
    de Oliveira, Perla Novais
    Carrer, Helaine
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):
  • [35] Mechanistic Concept of Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Responses of the Potato Crop to Heat and Drought Stress
    Lal, Milan Kumar
    Tiwari, Rahul Kumar
    Kumar, Awadhesh
    Dey, Abhijit
    Kumar, Ravinder
    Kumar, Dharmendra
    Jaiswal, Arvind
    Changan, Sushil Sudhakar
    Raigond, Pinky
    Dutt, Som
    Luthra, Satish Kumar
    Mandal, Sayanti
    Singh, Madan Pal
    Paul, Vijay
    Singh, Brajesh
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (21):
  • [36] Physiological and molecular responses of stress sensitive and tolerant banana genotypes to drought heat and their combination
    Chaudhari, R. S.
    Jangale, B. L.
    Sane, A. P.
    Sane, P. V.
    Krishna, B.
    XXXI INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, IHC2022: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADAPTATION OF HORTICULTURAL PLANTS TO ABIOTIC STRESSES, 2023, 1372 : 33 - 41
  • [37] Editorial: Hormones and biostimulants in plants: physiological and molecular insights on plant stress responses
    Jahan, Mohammad Shah
    Hasan, Md Mahadi
    Rahman, Md Atikur
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [38] Adaptive responses of Populus kangdingensis to drought stress
    Yin, CY
    Peng, YH
    Zang, RG
    Zhu, YP
    Li, CY
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2005, 123 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [39] Physiological and Proteomic Responses of Rice Peduncles to Drought Stress
    Muthurajan, Raveendran
    Shobbar, Zahra-Sadat
    Jagadish, S. V. K.
    Bruskiewich, Richard
    Ismail, Abdelbagi
    Leung, Hei
    Bennett, John
    MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 48 (02) : 173 - 182
  • [40] The Physiological and Photosynthetic Responses of Pennisetum sp to Drought Stress
    Liu, Fengshan
    Wang, Peidan
    Lin, Dongmei
    Wang, Xudong
    Xie, Changhai
    Liu, Hongwei
    Lin, Zhanxi
    2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (ICEEP 2015), 2015, : 4499 - 4503