Conflicting Consumer Beliefs Influencing Eco-Innovation Adoption: Motives and Barriers for Accepting the Laser Marking of Organic Products

被引:3
作者
Pfiffelmann, Jean [1 ]
Untilov, Olga [2 ]
Thogersen, John [3 ]
Franck, Romain [4 ]
机构
[1] EM Strasbourg Business Sch, Dept Mkt, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[2] Audencia Business Sch, Dept Mkt, Nantes, France
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Management, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] IESEG Sch Management, Dept Mkt & Sales Management, Lille, France
关键词
eco-innovation adoption; innovation resistance theory; laser marking; mixed-method design; organic labeling; theory of consumption values; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; RISK PERCEPTIONS; FOOD-CONSUMPTION; GREEN; BEHAVIOR; WILLINGNESS; RESPONSES; CHOICE; BUY; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1002/mar.22156
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In response to regulatory requirements and consumer demand for sustainable products, producers of organic products are beginning to use laser marking to reduce packaging and, thereby, packaging waste. However, the consumer responses to this "high-tech" eco-innovation remain unexplored. Using a mixed-method approach, we collected qualitative and quantitative data on responses to the laser marking of organic products from 328 French participants. Guided by the theory of consumption values and innovation resistance theory, we conducted a thematic analysis of answers to an open-ended question which probed consumers' motives for and barriers to adopting laser marking. The most frequently stated motive was ecological benefits, and the most reported barriers were risks and tradition. Structural equation modeling revealed that attitudes toward laser-marked organic products are positively impacted by social, emotional, and functional values and are negatively impacted by barriers related to images and emotions. Consumers' attitudes toward laser-marked organic products strongly affect their willingness to buy such products. To increase the acceptance of laser marking, managers and policymakers should mitigate false-negative consumer perceptions, including doubts about its eco-friendliness and safety, thereby facilitating greater acceptance of this eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 891
页数:26
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]   When sustainability backfires: A review on the unintended negative side-effects of product and service sustainability on consumer behavior [J].
Acuti, Diletta ;
Pizzetti, Marta ;
Dolnicar, Sara .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2022, 39 (10) :1933-1945
[2]   Drivers, barriers and performance outcomes of sustainable packaging: a systematic literature review [J].
Afif, Karima ;
Rebolledo, Claudia ;
Roy, Jacques .
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2022, 124 (03) :915-935
[3]  
Agence Bio, 2021, ORGANIC SECTOR EUROP
[4]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[5]  
Allegra V, 2012, ITAL J FOOD SCI, V24, P160
[6]   A place for emotion in attitude models [J].
Allen, CT ;
Machleit, KA ;
Kleine, SS ;
Notani, AS .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (04) :494-499
[7]   A consumer definition of eco-friendly packaging [J].
Anh Thu Nguyen ;
Parker, Lukas ;
Brennan, Linda ;
Lockrey, Simon .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
[8]   Elaborating on the attitude-behaviour gap regarding organic products: young Danish consumers and in-store food choice [J].
Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica ;
Aagaard, Emilie Marie Niebuhr .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2014, 38 (05) :550-558
[9]  
ATS-Tanner, 2024, AUTOCOLLANTS FRUITS
[10]   An Exploration and Investigation of Edible Insect Consumption: The Impacts of Image and Description on Risk Perceptions and Purchase Intent [J].
Baker, Melissa A. ;
Shin, Jungyoung Tiffany ;
Kim, Young Wook .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2016, 33 (02) :94-112