Vaginal Estrogen Prescribing and Cost Trends Among Medicare Part D Beneficiaries

ImportanceIn 2016, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a Committee Opinion on the safety of vaginal estrogen (VE) in estrogen-dependent breast cancer patients. Since that time, prescribing trends of VE have not been studied.ObjectiveOur objective was to analyze expenditure and prescribing trends of VE from 2016 to 2020 for Medicare Part D beneficiaries.Study DesignIn this retrospective review, we queried the Medicare Part D Spending and Prescriber Datasets from 2016 to 2020 to identify claims for VE. Trends regarding claims, expenditures, beneficiaries, and prescribers were examined. A subanalysis of the Medicare Part D Prescriber Dataset was performed for obstetrician-gynecologist-specific trends. Statistical analysis was done with the Kruskal-Wallis test.ResultsFrom 2016 to 2020 for all specialties, the number of VE claims decreased annually from 945,331 in 2016 to 320,571 in 2020. Most claims were for Estrace (49.5%) followed by Yuvafem (23.3%), Vagifem (14.5%), and Estring (12.7%). The number of VE prescribers decreased from 20,216 to 5,380, with obstetrician-gynecologists comprising 60% of all prescribers. Beneficiaries decreased by more than 70% from 439,210 to 123,318, whereas average spending per beneficiary increased from $688.52 to $1,027.55. Total annual spending on VE decreased from $277,891,645 to $106,679,580. However, average spending per claim increased from $293.40 to $355.28 and increased for all products besides Yuvafem.ConclusionsVaginal estrogen claims, beneficiaries, and total expenditures across all provider types have decreased from 2016 to 2020. However, spending per beneficiary and VE claims have increased. Our data suggest that utilization and accessibility of vaginal estrogen may be influenced, in part, by cost.