A state-of-the-art review of current code provisions for girders with flange holes

被引:0
|
作者
Arasaratnam, P. [1 ]
Roy, Satya Sapath [2 ]
Wang, Jiaji [3 ]
机构
[1] TYLin, Lead Struct Bridge Engineer & Project Manager, New York, NY USA
[2] TYLin, New York, PA USA
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Civil Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Flange holes; Flange fastener holes; Flexural capacity; Steel girders; Steel beams; 15 % rule; Net-to-gross flange area; BEHAVIOR; BEAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.108155
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Steel structures construction often necessitates fabrication of holes in the flanges of steel beams and girders often for bolted connections. These holes facilitate connections between beams and other structural components in buildings, as well as between girders for continuity in bridge systems. While bolt holes in compression flanges have minimal impact on load-carrying capacity, they can significantly affect the strength and ductility of girders under tension or flexure. In such cases, the load-carrying capacity at the strength limit state may be governed by the fracture strength of the net flange section, rather than the yielding of the gross section. In the past, various design codes, including the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, accounted for bolt holes in tension flanges through the 15 % rule. This guideline was established by the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) in 1963 following the landmark study of Lilly and Carpenter (1940). Over time, international design codes have evolved from allowable stress design to load resistance factor design, reflecting advancements in steel production and improved understanding of structural behavior. This paper presents a detailed examination of the evolution of international design codes for flanges with bolt or fastener holes, focusing on determining flexural strength. It also introduces a proposed method, established based on full-scale experimental results, and provides a comprehensive comparison of this method with existing international standards.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A state-of-the-art review of prestressed concrete tub girders for bridge structures
    Wang J.
    Kim Y.J.
    Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [2] Concrete–filled steel tube truss girders—a state-of-the-art review
    Joseph J.R.
    Henderson J.H.
    Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2023, 70 (01):
  • [3] State-of-the-Art Review on Determining Prestress Losses in Prestressed Concrete Girders
    Bonopera, Marco
    Chang, Kuo-Chun
    Lee, Zheng-Kuan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (20): : 1 - 14
  • [4] Bioprinting Technology: A Current State-of-the-Art Review
    Dababneh, Amer B.
    Ozbolat, Ibrahim T.
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (06):
  • [5] A state-of-the-art review of vertical ground motion (VGM) characteristics, effects and provisions
    Nayak, Chittaranjan B.
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2021, 6 (02)
  • [6] A state-of-the-art review of vertical ground motion (VGM) characteristics, effects and provisions
    Chittaranjan B. Nayak
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2021, 6
  • [7] Trigeminal nerve stimulation: a current state-of-the-art review
    Powell K.
    Lin K.
    Tambo W.
    Saavedra A.P.
    Sciubba D.
    Al Abed Y.
    Li C.
    Bioelectronic Medicine, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [8] Deep learning and the electrocardiogram: review of the current state-of-the-art
    Somani, Sulaiman
    Russak, Adam J.
    Richter, Felix
    Zhao, Shan
    Vaid, Akhil
    Chaudhry, Fayzan
    De Freitas, Jessica K.
    Naik, Nidhi
    Miotto, Riccardo
    Nadkarni, Girish N.
    Narula, Jagat
    Argulian, Edgar
    Glicksberg, Benjamin S.
    EUROPACE, 2021, 23 (08): : 1179 - 1191
  • [9] State-of-the-art review
    Langhoff-Roos, Jens
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (09) : 963 - 964
  • [10] STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW
    Filipiak, Krzysztof J.
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2013, 71 (05)