Factors influencing employers' support for employees with acquired brain injuries or mental illness to return to- and stay in work: A qualitative systematic review

被引:4
作者
Craven, Kristelle [1 ]
Perez, Blanca De Dios [1 ]
Holmes, Jain [1 ]
Fisher, Rebecca [2 ]
Radford, Kathryn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Rehabil & Ageing Res CRAR, Nottingham, England
[2] NHS England, Med Directorate, London, England
来源
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION | 2024年 / 79卷 / 01期
关键词
Return to work; vocational rehabilitation; employment; work; work engagement; systematic review; TO-WORK; META-SYNTHESIS; DECISION AID; DISORDERS; PEOPLE; STAKEHOLDERS; METAANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY; INDIVIDUALS; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-230214
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: People with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) often experience residual limitations and co-morbid mental illnesses that restrict work participation. Employers are key in enabling successful return-to-work and job retention. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to explore employers' perspectives of factors influencing their support for people with ABIs and/or mental illness to return to- and stay in work. Review questions focused on barriers and facilitators to their support, and contextual characteristics present at the time. METHODS: Five databases were searched from October 2010 until November 2023 for relevant qualitative studies published in English. Findings from included studies (N N = 25) were synthesised using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Included studies focused on employees with ABI or mental illness, rather than dually diagnosed ABI and mental illness. Employers' support was influenced by their awareness/knowledge of- and attitudes towards the employee's condition/illness; their skills and experience in supportive strategies; factors related to provision of work accommodations; and stakeholder influence. Similarities and differences in influential factors were observed across the ABI and mental illness literature. Contextual characteristics related to organisational characteristics, cultural taboo, and involvement of certain stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: ABI survivors (with and without co-morbid mental illness) and their employers may benefit from specialist support and resources to guide them through the return-to-work process. Further research is needed to investigate employers' knowledge of ABI and mental illness and supportive strategies. Exploration of the influence of other stakeholders, sociodemographic characteristics, and contextual factors on employers' return-to-work and retention support for ABI survivors with co-morbid mental illness is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 121
页数:29
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   What characterises work and workplaces that retain their employees following acquired brain injury? Systematic review [J].
Alves, Daniele Evelin ;
Nilsen, Wendy ;
Fure, Silje Christine Reistad ;
Enehaug, Heidi ;
Howe, Emilie Isager ;
Lovstad, Marianne ;
Fink, Louisa ;
Andelic, Nada ;
Spjelkavik, Oystein .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 77 (02) :122-130
[2]   Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders [J].
Andersen, Malene Friis ;
Nielsen, Karina M. ;
Brinkmann, Svend .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2012, 38 (02) :93-104
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NVivo qualitative data analysis software Version 11.4.1 for Mac
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: National Clinical Guidelines
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2023, FAQs
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Equality Act 2010, c15
[8]   Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum [J].
Balasooriya-Smeekens, Chantal ;
Bateman, Andrew ;
Mant, Jonathan ;
De Simoni, Anna .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (04)
[9]   VISION-RELATED SYMPTOMS AFTER ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY AND THE ASSOCIATION WITH MENTAL FATIGUE, ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION [J].
Berthold Lindstedt, Marta ;
Johansson, Jan ;
Ygge, Jan ;
Borg, Kristian .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (07) :499-505
[10]   Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches [J].
Booth, Andrew ;
Noyes, Jane ;
Flemming, Kate ;
Gerhardus, Ansgar ;
Wahlster, Philip ;
van der Wilt, Gert Jan ;
Mozygemba, Kati ;
Refolo, Pietro ;
Sacchini, Dario ;
Tummers, Marcia ;
Rehfuess, Eva .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 99 :41-52