Global perspectives on COVID-19 vaccination: Impacts on well-being and inequality

被引:0
作者
Leblang, David [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Michael D. [3 ]
Wesselbaum, Dennis [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Polit, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Batten Sch Publ Policy, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] US Govt Accountabil Off, Appl Res & Methods, Ctr Econ, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Econ, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
COVID-19; vaccination; Mental health; Public health policy; Subjective well-being; Well-being inequality; BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; PSYCHOLOGY; HEALTH; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126906
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study aims to examine the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and subjective wellbeing (SWB), as well as well-being inequality. It employs a conceptual framework that incorporates demographic characteristics, socioeconomic factors, health, and social support. Methods: Using data from the Gallup World Poll (2021-2022), which includes 131,910 respondents across 96 countries, we analyze the association between vaccination status and SWB. The Cantril ladder technique is employed to measure SWB, while regression analyses are conducted to estimate the conditional mean and variance of well-being, allowing for an assessment of well-being inequality. Results: Our findings indicate that vaccinated individuals report significantly higher levels of current SWB (p < .01) and lower well-being inequality (p < .01) than unvaccinated people. Specifically, vaccination is associated with a 0.04 standard deviation increase in SWB and a 0.06 standard deviation decrease in interpersonal wellbeing inequality. Moreover, those vaccinated exhibit greater optimism regarding their future well-being. Conclusion: The results underscore the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in enhancing both current and expected future well-being while reducing well-being inequality. These findings suggest that public health policies should prioritize vaccine uptake and address underlying socioeconomic factors to promote overall mental health and well-being in the population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Five priorities for universal COVID-19 vaccination Comment [J].
Abecassis, Adrien .
LANCET, 2021, 398 (10297) :285-286
[2]   Inequality and COVID-19 in Sweden: Relative risks of nine bad life events, by four social gradients, in pandemic vs. prepandemic years [J].
Altmejd, Adam ;
Ostergren, Olof ;
Bjorkegren, Evelina ;
Persson, Torsten .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (46)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264191655-EN
[4]  
Ball P, 2020, NATURE, V581, P371, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z
[5]  
Banks J, 2021, World Happiness Report, P109
[6]   Conditional cash lotteries increase COVID-19 vaccination rates [J].
Barber, Andrew ;
West, Jeremy .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 81
[7]   How Comparable are the Gallup World Poll Life Satisfaction Data? [J].
Bjornskov, Christian .
JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2010, 11 (01) :41-60
[8]   Well-being over time in Britain and the USA [J].
Blanchflower, DG ;
Oswald, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (7-8) :1359-1386
[9]   Inequality and the COVID-19 Crisis in the United Kingdom [J].
Blundell, Richard ;
Dias, Monica Costa ;
Cribb, Jonathan ;
Joyce, Robert ;
Waters, Tom ;
Wernham, Thomas ;
Xu, Xiaowei .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, 2022, 14 :607-636
[10]   Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics [J].
Camerer, C .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (19) :10575-10577