The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records onHealth Care Engagement: Systematic Review

被引:1
作者
Alomar, Dalia [1 ]
Almashmoum, Maryam
Eleftheriou, Iliada
Whelan, Pauline
Ainsworth, John
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci,Manchester Academi, Vaughan House,Portsmouth St, Manchester M13 9GB, England
关键词
electronic health records; personal health record; health care engagement; empowerment; patient experience; patient satisfaction; health care services; systematic review; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.2196/56473
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health information technologies, including electronic health records (EHRs), have revolutionized health caredelivery. These technologies promise to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through improved patient health informationmanagement. Despite the transformative potential of EHRs, the extent to which patient access contributes to increased engagementwith health care services within different clinical setting remains a distinct and underexplored facet. Objective: This systematic review aims to investigate the impact of patient access to EHRs on health care engagement.Specifically, we seek to determine whether providing patients with access to their EHRs contributes to improved engagementwith health care services. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review search was conducted across various international databases, including OvidMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 2010, to November 15,2023. The search on these databases was conducted using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms relatedto patient access to electronic health records, patient engagement, and health care services. Studies were included if they assessedthe impact of patient access to EHRs on health care engagement and provided evidence (quantitative or qualitative) for that. Theguidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 statement were followedfor study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The included studies were assessed for quality using the MixedMethods Appraisal Tool, and the results were reported using a narrative synthesis. Results: The initial search from the databases yielded 1737 studies, to which, after scanning their reference lists, we added 10studies. Of these 1747 studies, 18 (1.03%) met the inclusion criteria for the final review. The synthesized evidence from thesestudies revealed a positive relationship between patient access to EHRs and health care engagement, addressing 6 categories ofhealth care engagement dimensions and outcomes, including treatment adherence and self-management, patient involvement andempowerment, health care communication and relationship, patient satisfaction and health outcomes, use of health care resources,and usability concerns and barriers. Conclusions: The findings suggested a positive association between patient access to EHRs and health care engagement. Theimplications of these findings for health care providers, policy makers, and patients should be considered, highlighting the potentialbenefits and challenges associated with implementing and promoting patient access to EHRs. Further research directions havebeen proposed to deepen our understanding of this dynamic relationship
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Smith EA, Lapinski J, Lichty-Hess J, Pier K., Using health information technology and data to improve chronic disease outcomes in federally qualified health centers in Maryland, Prev Chronic Dis, 13, (2016)
  • [2] Assiri G., The impact of patient access to their electronic health record on medication management safety: a narrative review, Saudi Pharm J, 30, 3, pp. 185-194, (2022)
  • [3] Varroud-Vial M., Improving diabetes management with electronic medical records, Diabetes Metab, 37, pp. S48-S52, (2011)
  • [4] Jung EY, Park DK, Kang HW, Lim YS., Personalized health management services based on personal health record (PHR), Stud Health Technol Inform, 192, (2013)
  • [5] Tapuria A, Porat T, Kalra D, Dsouza G, Xiaohui S, Curcin V., Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review, Inform Health Soc Care, 46, 2, pp. 192-204, (2021)
  • [6] Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Kralovec P, Foster G, Worzala C, Charles D, Et al., Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: progress continues, but challenges persist, Health Aff (Millwood), 34, 12, pp. 2174-2180, (2015)
  • [7] Lye CT, Forman HP, Daniel JG, Krumholz HM., The 21st Century Cures Act and electronic health records one year later: will patients see the benefits?, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 25, 9, pp. 1218-1220, (2018)
  • [8] Davis S, Roudsari A, Courtney KL., Shared decision making via personal health record technology for routine use of diabetic youth: a study protocol, Stud Health Technol Inform, 235, pp. 63-67, (2017)
  • [9] Davis S, Roudsari A, Raworth R, Courtney KL, MacKay L., Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 24, 4, pp. 857-866, (2017)
  • [10] Roehrs A, da Costa CA, Righi RD, de Oliveira KS., Personal health records: a systematic literature review, J Med Internet Res, 19, 1, (2017)