Translation and validation of the Hindi version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15H) questionnaire: A prospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Chilkoti, Geetanjali T. [1 ]
Beniwal, Manoj [1 ]
Saxena, Ashok K. [1 ]
Malhotra, Rajeev K. [2 ]
Tiwari, Spriha [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Med Sci & Guru Teg Bahadur Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Delhi, India
[2] Dr BRAIRCH All India Inst Med Sci, Delhi Canc Registry, Surg Oncol, Delhi, India
[3] Inst Human Behav & Allied Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol, Delhi, India
关键词
Anaesthesia; Hindi language; QoR-15; score; Quality of Recovery score; reliability; translation; validation; POSTOPERATIVE QUALITY; SCORE; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_924_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: The Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 questionnaire is self-rated and commonly used to assess QoR following anaesthesia. QoR-15 has been validated in many languages, but the Hindi version (QoR-15H) has not yet undergone formal validation. We aimed to translate the QoR-15 questionnaire into Hindi and evaluate its validity and reliability in the Hindi-speaking population. Methods: The prospective cohort study was conducted among patients scheduled for elective general surgery under either general or regional anaesthesia. QoR-15H was used twice before surgery (T1 and T2; 30 min apart) and twice on postoperative day 1 (T3 and T4; 30 min apart). We assessed its validity, reliability and clinical feasibility. Results: A total of 300 patients were included. The recruitment and feasibility rates were 67.8% and 90.36%, respectively. A high negative correlation between the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Pain and QoR-15H in both the preoperative and postoperative periods indicated significant convergent validity. Age, duration of surgery and total hospital stay were positively correlated with NRS and negatively correlated with QoR-15H scores. The optimal cut-off points of the QoR-15H score at par to NRS <= 3 equivalent was <95.5. The sensitivity and specificity were 96.6 and 1.0, respectively, indicating good discriminant power. For reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than 0.98 and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was greater than 0.9. Conclusion: The Hindi version of the QoR-15 questionnaire is valid, reliable and feasible for patients undergoing general surgeries under general and regional anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 401
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[2]   Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale [J].
Bu, Xue-Shan ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Zuo, Yun-Xia .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (03) :251-259
[3]   Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population [J].
Demumieux, Francois ;
Ludes, Pierre-Olivier ;
Diemunsch, Pierre ;
Bennett-Guerrero, Elliott ;
Lujic, Marko ;
Lefebvre, Francois ;
Noll, Eric .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 124 (06) :761-767
[4]   Hindi translation and cultural adaptation of the quality of recovery score-40 (QoR-40 score): A validation study [J].
Govil, Nishith ;
Rathore, Rishika ;
Tiwari, Ajeet ;
Garg, Pankaj K. ;
Parag, Kumar ;
Mishra, Priyanka .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (06) :533-539
[5]   Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15 [J].
Kleif, J. ;
Edwards, H. M. ;
Sort, R. ;
Vilandt, J. ;
Gogenur, I. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 59 (07) :912-920
[6]   Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire [J].
Lee, Jun Ho ;
Ki, Minjong ;
Choi, Seungseo ;
Woo, Cheol Jong ;
Kim, Deokkyu ;
Lim, Hyungsun ;
Kim, Dong-Chan .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 74 (02) :142-149
[7]   Validation of the Swedish version of Quality of Recovery score-15: a multicentre, cohort study [J].
Lyckner, S. ;
Boregard, I. -L. ;
Zetterlund, E. -L. ;
Chew, M. S. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 62 (07) :893-902
[8]   Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40 [J].
Myles, PS ;
Weitkamp, B ;
Jones, K ;
Melick, J ;
Hensen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (01) :11-15
[9]   Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10 811 patients [J].
Myles, PS ;
Williams, DL ;
Hendrata, M ;
Anderson, H ;
Weeks, AM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (01) :6-10
[10]   Translation and validation of the Japanese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire [J].
Nakatani, Shohei ;
Ida, Mitsuru ;
Tanaka, Yuu ;
Okamoto, Naoko ;
Wang, Xiaoying ;
Nakatani, Hitomi ;
Sato, Mariko ;
Naito, Yusuke ;
Kawaguchi, Masahiko .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (03) :426-433