Development, Evaluation, and User Testing of a Decision-Making Toolkit to Promote Organizations to Implement Universal Tumor Screening for Lynch Syndrome

被引:0
作者
Kulchak Rahm, Alanna [1 ]
Wolfinger, Tara [2 ]
Salvati, Zachary M. [1 ]
Schneider, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Cragun, Deborah [2 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger, Dept Genom Hlth, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
关键词
Lynch syndrome; Universal tumor screening; Implementation; Organizational decision-making; CFIR; IPDAS; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PROGRAMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1159/000540943
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Introduction:The Implementing Universal Lynch SyndromeScreening (IMPULSS) study explained institutional variationin universal tumor screening (UTS) with the goal of identi-fying ways to aid organizational decision-makers in im-plementing and optimizing Lynch syndrome UTS programs.Methods:After applying the Consolidated Framework forImplementation Research (CFIR 1.0) to analyze interviewswith 66 stakeholders across 9 healthcare systems to developa toolkit for implementation, we adapted the InternationalPatient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) to assess toolkitpotential to aid decision-making consistent with organiza-tional values. We then conducted user testing with twoexperienced and four non-experienced implementers of UTSto improve the content and functionality of the toolkit andassess its acceptability and appropriateness.Results:Toolkitcomponents were organized to addressfindings related toCFIR 1.0 constructs of evidence strength and quality, relativeadvantage, cost, engaging, planning, executing, and re-flecting and evaluating. A home page was added to directusers to different sections based on whether they are de-ciding to implement UTS, planning for implementation,improving an existing UTS program, or considering a dif-ferent approach to identify patients with Lynch syndrome.Upon initial evaluation, 31 of 64 IPDAS criteria were met bythe original toolkit. All users rated the toolkit as acceptableand appropriate for assisting organizational decision-making and identified multiple areas for improvement.Numerous iterative changes were made to the toolkit, re-sulting in meeting 17 of the previously unmet IPDAS criteria.Conclusion:We demonstrate the rigorous development of atoolkit guided by the CFIR and show how user testing helpedimprove the toolkit to ensure it is acceptable, appropriate,and meets most IPDAS criteria relevant to organizationalvalues-based decision-making.(c) 2024 The Author(s).Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 149
页数:14
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing
    Lastra, Enrique
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Maria
    Llorente, Beatriz
    Bernuy, Coralina
    Jesus Barrio, M.
    Perez-Cabornero, Lucia
    Duran, Mercedes
    Garcia-Giron, Carlos
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 (04) : 254 - 262
  • [2] Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing
    Enrique Lastra
    María García-González
    Beatriz Llorente
    Coralina Bernuy
    M. Jesús Barrio
    Lucía Pérez-Cabornero
    Mercedes Durán
    Carlos García-Girón
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2012, 14 : 254 - 262
  • [3] How Health-Care Organizations Implement Shared Decision-making When It Is Required for Reimbursement The Case of Lung Cancer Screening
    Tabriz, Amir Alishahi
    Neslund-Dudas, Christine
    Turner, Kea
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Lafata, Jennifer Elston
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (01) : 413 - 425
  • [4] Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer
    Hodan, Rachel
    Rodgers-Fouche, Linda
    Arora, Sanjeevani
    Dominguez-Valentin, Mev
    Kanth, Priyanka
    Katona, Bryson W.
    Mraz, Kathryn A.
    Roberts, Maegan E.
    Vilar, Eduardo
    Soto-Azghani, Cynthia M.
    Brand, Randall E.
    Esplin, Edward D.
    Perez, Kimberly
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2022, 31 (04) : 949 - 955