Comparison of Outpatient Mechanical Cervical Ripening Methods to Standard Inpatient Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Goering, Mary P. [1 ]
Wunderlich, Whitney L. [2 ]
Vacquier, Marc C. [2 ]
Watson, David A. [3 ]
Drake, Kelly A. [4 ]
Hoffman, Sandra I. [4 ]
Schulte, Anna [2 ]
Colicchia, Laura C. [5 ]
Sidebottom, Abbey C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Allina Hlth, United Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Allina Hlth, Care Delivery Res, Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA
[3] Childrens Minnesota, Childrens Minnesota Res Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Allina Hlth, Abbott Northwestern Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Allina Hlth, Minnesota Perinatal Phys, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
cervical ripening; induction; Foley balloon; osmotic dilator; outpatient; Dilapan-S; FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR INDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1055/a-2553-9258
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to assess clinical efficiency and maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening using mechanical methods (osmotic dilators and Foley balloon) compared with patients who underwent inpatient ripening. Study Design A retrospective cohort study from March 2020 to March 2022 compared patients with low-risk, term, singleton pregnancies who underwent outpatient cervical ripening to clinically similar patients who had inpatient ripening. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for analysis of outcomes to account for differences in groups and comparisons of outcomes are reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The cohort included 391 patients (116 outpatient, 275 inpatient). Among the outpatient group, half used only mechanical devices, and all others received additional pharmacological methods after admission for labor induction. Among the inpatient group, the most common cervical ripening method was pharmacological only (66.2%), followed by both pharmacological and mechanical (25.8%), and 8% used only mechanical. After outpatient cervical ripening, patients had significantly higher cervical dilation (mean difference 1.9 cm, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.3) and simplified bishop scores (mean difference 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.1) on admission compared with the inpatient group. The average time from admission to delivery was 5.8 hours shorter (95% CI: -8.6, -2.9) for the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group, and the average total length of stay was 7.1 hours shorter (95% CI: -12.1, -2.1) for the outpatients among patients with vaginal deliveries. Both groups had similar hours of oxytocin use, and mode of delivery, and did not differ for maternal complications or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Outpatient cervical ripening using multiple mechanical methods was associated with significantly higher cervical dilation, shorter average time from patient admission to delivery, and shorter total length of stay for vaginal deliveries. Outpatient cervical ripening may be an important option for easing resource utilization for induced labor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retrospective Comparison of PGE2 Vaginal Insert and Foley Catheter for Outpatient Cervical Ripening
    Blair, Rachel
    Harvey, Marie-Andree
    Pudwell, Jessica
    Bougie, Olga
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2020, 42 (09) : 1103 - 1110
  • [32] Cervical ripening for a singleton fetus in breech prensentation at term: Comparison between mechanical and pharmaceutical methods
    Nkobetchou, Maelys
    Korb, Diane
    Giral, Emilie
    Renevier, Bruno
    Sibony, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (01)
  • [33] Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae
    Ahmed, Waleed Ali Sayed
    Ibrahim, Zakia Mahdy
    Ashor, Osama Elsayed
    Mohamed, Mariam Lotfi
    Ahmed, Magdy Refaat
    Elshahat, Amal Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (11) : 1489 - 1494
  • [34] The Timing of Adverse Events with Foley Catheter Preinduction Cervical Ripening; Implications for Outpatient Use
    Sciscione, Anthony C.
    Bedder, Casey L.
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Ruhstaller, Kelly
    Shlossman, Phillip A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 31 (09) : 781 - 785
  • [35] Outpatient management of pre-induction cervical ripening
    Chen, Vicky
    Sheehan, Penelope
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (15) : 2954 - 2960
  • [36] Survey on cervical ripening practices in France
    Bel, S.
    Gaudineau, A.
    Zorgnotti, L.
    Sananes, N.
    Fritz, G.
    Langer, B.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2014, 42 (05): : 301 - 305
  • [37] Application of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening
    Wen, Chaoyue
    Wang, Jun
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2023, 20 (10) : 843 - 849
  • [38] Cervical ripening balloon compared with vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term: A prospective cohort study
    Ducarme, Guillaume
    Gilman, Serena
    Sauvee, Margot
    Planche, Lucie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 166 (03) : 1068 - 1076
  • [39] Patient attitudes towards outpatient cervical ripening prior to induction of labour at an Australian tertiary hospital
    Sutton, Claire
    Harding, Julia
    Griffin, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 36 (07) : 921 - 928
  • [40] Outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening with a slow-release dinoprostone vaginal insert in term pregnancies on maternal, neonatal, and birth outcomes: A systematic review
    Mazzoli, Ilenia
    O'Malley, Deirdre
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2023, 50 (03): : 473 - 485