Comparison of Outpatient Mechanical Cervical Ripening Methods to Standard Inpatient Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Goering, Mary P. [1 ]
Wunderlich, Whitney L. [2 ]
Vacquier, Marc C. [2 ]
Watson, David A. [3 ]
Drake, Kelly A. [4 ]
Hoffman, Sandra I. [4 ]
Schulte, Anna [2 ]
Colicchia, Laura C. [5 ]
Sidebottom, Abbey C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Allina Hlth, United Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Allina Hlth, Care Delivery Res, Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA
[3] Childrens Minnesota, Childrens Minnesota Res Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Allina Hlth, Abbott Northwestern Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Allina Hlth, Minnesota Perinatal Phys, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
cervical ripening; induction; Foley balloon; osmotic dilator; outpatient; Dilapan-S; FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR INDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1055/a-2553-9258
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to assess clinical efficiency and maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening using mechanical methods (osmotic dilators and Foley balloon) compared with patients who underwent inpatient ripening. Study Design A retrospective cohort study from March 2020 to March 2022 compared patients with low-risk, term, singleton pregnancies who underwent outpatient cervical ripening to clinically similar patients who had inpatient ripening. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for analysis of outcomes to account for differences in groups and comparisons of outcomes are reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The cohort included 391 patients (116 outpatient, 275 inpatient). Among the outpatient group, half used only mechanical devices, and all others received additional pharmacological methods after admission for labor induction. Among the inpatient group, the most common cervical ripening method was pharmacological only (66.2%), followed by both pharmacological and mechanical (25.8%), and 8% used only mechanical. After outpatient cervical ripening, patients had significantly higher cervical dilation (mean difference 1.9 cm, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.3) and simplified bishop scores (mean difference 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.1) on admission compared with the inpatient group. The average time from admission to delivery was 5.8 hours shorter (95% CI: -8.6, -2.9) for the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group, and the average total length of stay was 7.1 hours shorter (95% CI: -12.1, -2.1) for the outpatients among patients with vaginal deliveries. Both groups had similar hours of oxytocin use, and mode of delivery, and did not differ for maternal complications or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Outpatient cervical ripening using multiple mechanical methods was associated with significantly higher cervical dilation, shorter average time from patient admission to delivery, and shorter total length of stay for vaginal deliveries. Outpatient cervical ripening may be an important option for easing resource utilization for induced labor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of prostaglandin and mechanical cervical ripening in the setting of small for gestational age neonates*
    Rossi, Robert M.
    Warshak, Carri R.
    Masters, Heather R.
    Regan, Jodi K.
    Kritzer, Sara A.
    Magner, Kristin P.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (22) : 3841 - 3846
  • [22] Outpatient Cervical Ripening: Where are we?
    El Helou, Nicole
    Buhle, Anna
    Pierce-Williams, Rebecca
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [23] Outpatient Cervical Ripening as a Method to Support Vaginal Birth
    Stephens-Hennessy, Beth M.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2017, 46 (03): : S12 - S12
  • [24] Retrospective comparison of effectiveness of balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening
    Baumont, M.
    Dap, M.
    Schweizer, C.
    Morel, O.
    Boukerrou, M.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2021, 49 (09): : 660 - 664
  • [25] Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Gavara, Rachana
    Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
    Goncharov, Arena D.
    Berry, Marissa
    Eid, Joe
    Goldman, Brett
    Nutter, Ana
    Moutos, Christopher P.
    Wang, Amanda M.
    Saade, George R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (04) : 584 - 590
  • [26] Dilapan-S vs standard methods for cervical ripening in term pregnancies: an individual patient data meta-analysis
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Pedroza, Claudia
    Gavara, Rachana
    Gupta, Janesh
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Saade, George R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2025, 7 (01)
  • [27] Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Misoprostol in Low-Risk Pregnancies
    Roloff, Kristina
    Nalbandyan, Kristina
    Cao, Suzanne
    Okekpe, C. Camille
    Dombrovsky, Inessa
    Valenzuela, Guillermo J.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [28] Outpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Balloon Catheter A Meta-Analysis
    Weinberg, Daniel
    Blue, Nathan
    Holbrook, Bradley
    Rayburn, William
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 62 (9-10) : 486 - 492
  • [29] Outpatient Cervical Ripening A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    McDonagh, Marian
    Skelly, Andrea C.
    Tilden, Ellen
    Brodt, Erika D.
    Dana, Tracy
    Hart, Erica
    Kantner, Shelby N.
    Fu, Rongwei
    Hermesch, Amy C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (06) : 1091 - 1101
  • [30] A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study)
    Wilkinson, C.
    Bryce, R.
    Adelson, P.
    Turnbull, D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (01) : 94 - 104