Comparison of Outpatient Mechanical Cervical Ripening Methods to Standard Inpatient Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Goering, Mary P. [1 ]
Wunderlich, Whitney L. [2 ]
Vacquier, Marc C. [2 ]
Watson, David A. [3 ]
Drake, Kelly A. [4 ]
Hoffman, Sandra I. [4 ]
Schulte, Anna [2 ]
Colicchia, Laura C. [5 ]
Sidebottom, Abbey C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Allina Hlth, United Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Allina Hlth, Care Delivery Res, Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA
[3] Childrens Minnesota, Childrens Minnesota Res Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Allina Hlth, Abbott Northwestern Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Allina Hlth, Minnesota Perinatal Phys, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
cervical ripening; induction; Foley balloon; osmotic dilator; outpatient; Dilapan-S; FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR INDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1055/a-2553-9258
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to assess clinical efficiency and maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening using mechanical methods (osmotic dilators and Foley balloon) compared with patients who underwent inpatient ripening. Study Design A retrospective cohort study from March 2020 to March 2022 compared patients with low-risk, term, singleton pregnancies who underwent outpatient cervical ripening to clinically similar patients who had inpatient ripening. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for analysis of outcomes to account for differences in groups and comparisons of outcomes are reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The cohort included 391 patients (116 outpatient, 275 inpatient). Among the outpatient group, half used only mechanical devices, and all others received additional pharmacological methods after admission for labor induction. Among the inpatient group, the most common cervical ripening method was pharmacological only (66.2%), followed by both pharmacological and mechanical (25.8%), and 8% used only mechanical. After outpatient cervical ripening, patients had significantly higher cervical dilation (mean difference 1.9 cm, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.3) and simplified bishop scores (mean difference 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.1) on admission compared with the inpatient group. The average time from admission to delivery was 5.8 hours shorter (95% CI: -8.6, -2.9) for the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group, and the average total length of stay was 7.1 hours shorter (95% CI: -12.1, -2.1) for the outpatients among patients with vaginal deliveries. Both groups had similar hours of oxytocin use, and mode of delivery, and did not differ for maternal complications or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Outpatient cervical ripening using multiple mechanical methods was associated with significantly higher cervical dilation, shorter average time from patient admission to delivery, and shorter total length of stay for vaginal deliveries. Outpatient cervical ripening may be an important option for easing resource utilization for induced labor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of outpatient with inpatient mifepristone usage for cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
    Baev, O.
    Karapetian, A.
    Babich, D.
    Sukhikh, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2023, 18
  • [2] Evaluation of an Outpatient Cervical Ripening Program Using Osmotic Dilators and Foley Balloon Catheters
    Sidebottom, Abbey C.
    Wunderlich, Whitney L.
    Vacquier, Marc C.
    Drake, Kelly A.
    Goering, Mary P.
    Hoffman, Sandra I.
    Watson, David A.
    Colicchia, Laura C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2025, 42 (05) : 618 - 629
  • [3] A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Adelson, Pamela
    Turnbull, Deborah
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [4] Patient Perspectives on Outpatient versus Inpatient Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor
    Watters, Amber
    Ekpe, Etoroabasi
    Okafor, Annette
    Donelan, Emily
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (15) : 2119 - 2124
  • [5] Outpatient cervical ripening
    Amorosa, Jennifer M. H.
    Stone, Joanne L.
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 488 - 494
  • [6] Is There a Place for Outpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening?
    Leopold, Beth
    Sciscione, Anthony
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 44 (04) : 583 - +
  • [7] Randomized control trial comparing hygroscopic cervical dilators to cervical ripening balloon for outpatient cervical ripening
    Lu, Anjanique Mariquit R.
    Lin, Brenda
    Shahani, Disha
    Demertzis, Kristen
    Muscat, Jolene
    Zabel, Elizabeth
    Olson, Payton
    Manayan, Olivia
    Nonnamaker, Emily
    McCue, Brigid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (04)
  • [8] Cervical ripening as an outpatient procedure in the pandemic - minimizing the inpatient days and lowering the socioeconomic costs
    Kummer, Julia
    Koenigbauer, Josefine Theresia
    Callister, Yvonne
    Pech, Luisa
    Rath, Werner
    Wegener, Silke
    Hellmeyer, Lars
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (09) : 1180 - 1188
  • [9] Cervical ripening by mechanical methods in France: evaluation of professional practices
    Cirier, J.
    Diguisto, C.
    Arlicot, C.
    Denis, C.
    Potin, J.
    Perrotin, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2015, 43 (05): : 361 - 366
  • [10] Medical and mechanical methods for cervical ripening
    Biron-Shental, T
    Fishman, A
    Fejgin, MD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 85 (02) : 159 - 160