Occlusal and Cephalometric Outcomes of Cleft Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:0
|
作者
Stonehouse-Smith, Daniel [1 ]
Abd Rahman, Aida N. A. [2 ]
Beale, Victoria [3 ]
Bellardie, Haydn [4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Ctr Craniofacial & Regenerat Biol, London, England
[2] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Dent, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Royal Manchester Childrens Hosp, North West England, Isle Man & North Wales Cleft Network, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Western Cape, Fac Dent, Cape Town, South Africa
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH | 2024年 / 10卷 / 06期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cleft; occlusion; orthodontics; orthognathic surgery; LE-FORT-I; MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT; LIP; PALATE; OSTEOTOMY; NEED; EUROCLEFT; STANDARD; CHILDREN; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.70019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAberrant facial growth in individuals affected by orofacial clefts can result in maxillary retrusion and class III malocclusion, with a proportion requiring surgical correction at cessation of growth. This study aimed to evaluate occlusal and cephalometric outcomes of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.Material and MethodsRetrospective cohort study in a United Kingdom cleft center. Participants included twenty-seven patients (20 males, 7 females) with cleft (n = 16 UCLP :7 BCLP :4 ICP) who consecutively underwent combined surgical treatment for Class III malocclusion between January 2013 and December 2017. Records were collected pre-treatment (T0), pre-surgery (T1) and at debond (T2). Models were scored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and cephalometric radiographs were traced and analyzed. Outcomes were assessed by an independent rater.ResultsMean age at surgery was 21.4 years (SD 4.9). Le Fort 1 advancement (mean 6.1 mm, SD 4.0) was performed in all cases. Additional procedures included mandibular setback (n = 2), cortico-cancellous bone grafting (n = 6) and genioplasty (n = 1). Mean T0 PAR score was 44.8 (SD 11.7), reducing to 3.6 (SD 2.0) at T2, indicating a mean % PAR score reduction of 91.6% (SD 4.7). Class III skeletal profiles improved from a mean T0 ANB of -2.1 degrees (SD 2.2), to 2.8 degrees (SD 1.6) at T2. Mean T0 overjet was -3.3 mm (SD 2.3), increasing to 2.6 mm (SD 1.3) at T2.ConclusionCleft orthognathic surgery differs in complexity and approach to routine orthognathics, however, these results demonstrate that occlusal outcomes can still be comparable with non-cleft populations. Outcome data can be used for comparison with other centers providing cleft orthognathic treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] One-Jaw versus Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Cleft: A Comparative Study Using 3D Imaging Virtual Surgical Planning
    Tsai, Yu-Hung
    Pai, Betty C. J.
    Lin, Hsiu-Hsia
    Ho, Cheng-Ting
    Lo, Lun-Jou
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [32] A retrospective cephalometric study on the craniofacial morphology of adult patients with unoperated submucous cleft palate
    Chen, Zhuo
    Cao, Congcong
    Yang, Jun
    Mao, Qirong
    Shi, Bing
    Li, Jingtao
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 51 (11) : 702 - 707
  • [33] Anterior Nasal Spine Relocation With Cleft Orthognathic Surgery
    Choi, Jong Woo
    Park, Hojin
    Kwon, Soon-Man
    Koh, Kyung S.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (08) : 2812 - 2815
  • [34] Difference in Degrees of Satisfaction with Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontic Treatment between Skeletal Class III and Cleft Patients
    Yim, Sunjin
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (04) : 985 - 991
  • [35] Evaluation of the effect of changes in cephalometric values after orthognathic surgery on estimated age and facial aesthetics
    Balel, Yunus
    Sen, Esengul
    Akbulut, Nihat
    Akbulut, Sibel
    Balel, Asuman
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (05)
  • [36] Complications following orthognathic surgery for patients with cleft lip/palate: A systematic review
    Yamaguchi, Kazuaki
    Lonic, Daniel
    Lo, Lun-Jou
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 115 (04) : 269 - 277
  • [37] Cephalometric for Orthognathic Surgery (COGS) Analysis for Saudi Population
    Siddika, Ayesha
    Ab Rahman, Shaifulizan
    Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2021, 21
  • [38] Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery for North Indian population
    Singh, Satinder Pal
    Utreja, Ashok Kumar
    Jena, Ashok Kumar
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2013, 4 (04) : 460 - 466
  • [39] Computerized Cephalometric Study of the Pharyngeal Airway Space in Patients Submitted to Orthognathic Surgery
    Gonçales E.S.
    Rocha J.F.
    Gonçales A.G.B.
    Yaedú R.Y.F.
    Sant’Ana E.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2014, 13 (3) : 253 - 258
  • [40] Reshaping Faces, Redefining Risks: A Systematic Review of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
    Chinta, Sachin R.
    Segrera, Sergio
    Friedman, Rebecca
    Shah, Alay R.
    Kantar, Rami S.
    Volk, Angela S.
    Staffenberg, David
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (19)