Occlusal and Cephalometric Outcomes of Cleft Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:0
|
作者
Stonehouse-Smith, Daniel [1 ]
Abd Rahman, Aida N. A. [2 ]
Beale, Victoria [3 ]
Bellardie, Haydn [4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Ctr Craniofacial & Regenerat Biol, London, England
[2] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Dent, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Royal Manchester Childrens Hosp, North West England, Isle Man & North Wales Cleft Network, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Western Cape, Fac Dent, Cape Town, South Africa
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH | 2024年 / 10卷 / 06期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cleft; occlusion; orthodontics; orthognathic surgery; LE-FORT-I; MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT; LIP; PALATE; OSTEOTOMY; NEED; EUROCLEFT; STANDARD; CHILDREN; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.70019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAberrant facial growth in individuals affected by orofacial clefts can result in maxillary retrusion and class III malocclusion, with a proportion requiring surgical correction at cessation of growth. This study aimed to evaluate occlusal and cephalometric outcomes of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.Material and MethodsRetrospective cohort study in a United Kingdom cleft center. Participants included twenty-seven patients (20 males, 7 females) with cleft (n = 16 UCLP :7 BCLP :4 ICP) who consecutively underwent combined surgical treatment for Class III malocclusion between January 2013 and December 2017. Records were collected pre-treatment (T0), pre-surgery (T1) and at debond (T2). Models were scored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and cephalometric radiographs were traced and analyzed. Outcomes were assessed by an independent rater.ResultsMean age at surgery was 21.4 years (SD 4.9). Le Fort 1 advancement (mean 6.1 mm, SD 4.0) was performed in all cases. Additional procedures included mandibular setback (n = 2), cortico-cancellous bone grafting (n = 6) and genioplasty (n = 1). Mean T0 PAR score was 44.8 (SD 11.7), reducing to 3.6 (SD 2.0) at T2, indicating a mean % PAR score reduction of 91.6% (SD 4.7). Class III skeletal profiles improved from a mean T0 ANB of -2.1 degrees (SD 2.2), to 2.8 degrees (SD 1.6) at T2. Mean T0 overjet was -3.3 mm (SD 2.3), increasing to 2.6 mm (SD 1.3) at T2.ConclusionCleft orthognathic surgery differs in complexity and approach to routine orthognathics, however, these results demonstrate that occlusal outcomes can still be comparable with non-cleft populations. Outcome data can be used for comparison with other centers providing cleft orthognathic treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reproducibility and reliability of digital occlusal planning for orthognathic surgery
    Almadi, D.
    Benington, P.
    Ju, X.
    Ayoub, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (10) : 1074 - 1080
  • [22] Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients
    Bill, Josip
    Proff, Peter
    Bayerlein, Thomas
    Blens, Torsten
    Gedrange, Tomas
    Reuther, Juergen
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 34 : 77 - 81
  • [23] Mandibular occlusal stability in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery
    Cenzato, Niccolo
    Marcolongo, Loris
    Stabilini, Andrea
    Macri, Lorenzo
    DENTAL CADMOS, 2023, 91 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [24] Craniofacial cephalometric morphologies in different cleft types: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 212 patients
    Lopez-Gimenez, Ana
    Silvestre-Rangil, Javier
    Silvestre, Francisco-Javier
    Paredes-Gallardo, Vanessa
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [25] Cephalometric predictors of future need for orthognathic surgery in Korean patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate despite long-term use of facemask with miniplate
    Yu, Sang-Hun
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Lee, Jong-Ho
    Kim, Sukwha
    On, Sung-Woon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2021, 51 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [26] Cephalometric Parameters as Predictive Factors for Orthognathic Surgery in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sennimalai, Karthik
    Mohaideen, Kaja
    Selvaraj, Madhanraj
    Siddiqui, Hamza Parvez
    Kharbanda, Om Prakash
    Katyal, Sakshi
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [27] Cephalometric image analysis and measurement for orthognathic surgery
    J. Yang
    X. Ling
    Y. Lu
    M. Wei
    G. Ding
    Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 2001, 39 : 279 - 284
  • [28] Cephalometric image analysis and measurement for orthognathic surgery
    Yang, J
    Ling, X
    Lu, Y
    Wei, M
    Ding, G
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2001, 39 (03) : 279 - 284
  • [29] Complications of orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review
    Zaroni, Fabio Marzullo
    Sales, Pedro Henrique da Hora
    Maffia, Francesco
    Scariot, Rafaela
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (06)
  • [30] Interrelationship between implant and orthognathic surgery for the rehabilitation of edentulous cleft palate patients: a case report
    Scarelli Lopes, Jose Fernando
    Nogueira Pinto, Joao Henrique
    Waldemarin Lopes, Monica Moraes
    Mazottini, Reinaldo
    Soares, Simone
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2015, 23 (02) : 224 - 229