Additive manufacturing for biomedical bone implants: Shaping the future of bones

被引:3
作者
Razzaq, Muhammad Hassan [1 ,2 ]
Zaheer, Muhammad Usama [1 ,2 ]
Asghar, Humaira [3 ]
Aktas, O. Cenk [4 ]
Aycan, Mehmet Fatih [1 ,2 ]
Mishra, Yogendra Kumar [3 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Addit Mfg Technol Applicat & Res Ctr EKTAM, TR-06980 Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Mads Clausen Inst, Smart Mat, NanoSYD, Alsion 2, DK-6400 Sonderborg, Denmark
[4] Univ Kiel, Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein UKSH, Dept Orthodont, Arnold Heller Str 3, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D materials printing; Artificial bone printing; Dental implants; Biomimetic lattice structures; Bioactive coatings; OF-THE-ART; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE COATINGS; POROUS SCAFFOLD DESIGN; IN-VIVO PERFORMANCE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; PORE-SIZE; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; POLYCAPROLACTONE SCAFFOLDS; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mser.2025.100931
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Perpetual innovation in technology, materials and processes has ushered in a new era of significant advancements in biomedical implants, which are critical for reestablishing functional capacity for patients affected with skeletal injuries or diseases. Traditional manufacturing methodologies are constrained by lack of customization, suboptimal biocompatibility, and mechanical incompatibility; however, additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing, is revolutionizing biomedical bone implants by addressing these critical challenges. This article provides a historical perspective on AM, an in-depth analysis of its various technologies and evaluates their suitability for producing different types of bone implants, including orthopedic, dental, craniofacial, spinal, joint, and maxillofacial implants. Material selection is a crucial aspect of implant fabrication, encompassing considerations from both the additive manufacturing processes and biocompatibility perspectives, so the use of metals, polymers, ceramics, composites and bioinks in AM is discussed, emphasizing their biocompatibility and mechanical properties. Moreover, this review examines the intricate design considerations for custom implants, including topological optimization, biomimetic designs and the crucial role of CAD and 3D modeling in crafting implants with desired porosity, surface roughness, and mechanical properties followed by surface modification strategies, including the deployment of bioactive coatings and advanced treatment modalities, engineered to augment osseointegration and modulate biological responses for improved implant integration. Furthermore, this review also examines the multifaceted challenges currently impeding the advancement of Additive Manufacturing in bone implant production, including substantial cost implications, pressing demands for novel material development, and the imperative for vigilant process optimization. On top of that, the potential integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is presented as a promising avenue for enhancing design processes, optimizing manufacturing parameters, and improving quality control. In conclusion, this paper highlights the significant advancements that Additive Manufacturing brings to the field of biomedical bone implants. By enabling the creation of customized, high-performance implants tailored to the specific needs of individual patients, AM promises to transform orthopedic care and related medical disciplines.
引用
收藏
页数:56
相关论文
共 706 条
[71]   Additive manufacturing of metallic lattice structures: Unconstrained design, accurate fabrication, fascinated performances, and challenges [J].
Chen, Liang-Yu ;
Liang, Shun-Xing ;
Liu, Yujing ;
Zhang, Lai-Chang .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING R-REPORTS, 2021, 146
[72]   Metallic implant biomaterials [J].
Chen, Qizhi ;
Thouas, George A. .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING R-REPORTS, 2015, 87 :1-57
[73]   Mechanical performance of PEEK-Ti6Al4V interpenetrating phase composites fabricated by powder bed fusion and vacuum infiltration targeting large and load-bearing implants [J].
Chen, Xu ;
Wu, Yanlong ;
Liu, Huilong ;
Wang, Yaning ;
Zhao, Guangbin ;
Zhang, Qingxian ;
Wang, Fu ;
Liu, Yaxiong .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2022, 215
[74]   Biomechanical study of expandable pedicle screw fixation in severe osteoporotic bone comparing with conventional and cement-augmented pedicle screws [J].
Chen, Yi-Long ;
Chen, Wen-Chuan ;
Chou, Chi-Wei ;
Chen, Jou-Wen ;
Chang, Chia-Ming ;
Lai, Yu-Shu ;
Cheng, Cheng-Kung ;
Wang, Shih-Tien .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2014, 36 (11) :1416-1420
[75]   The Tetragonal-Monoclinic Transformation in Zirconia: Lessons Learned and Future Trends [J].
Chevalier, Jerome ;
Gremillard, Laurent ;
Virkar, Anil V. ;
Clarke, David R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2009, 92 (09) :1901-1920
[76]   Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials [J].
Chia, Helena N. ;
Wu, Benjamin M. .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 9
[77]   Fabrication of Scaffolds for Bone-Tissue Regeneration [J].
Chocholata, Petra ;
Kulda, Vlastimil ;
Babuska, Vaclav .
MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (04)
[78]   THE ELASTIC-MODULI OF HUMAN SUBCHONDRAL, TRABECULAR, AND CORTICAL BONE TISSUE AND THE SIZE-DEPENDENCY OF CORTICAL BONE MODULUS [J].
CHOI, K ;
KUHN, JL ;
CIARELLI, MJ ;
GOLDSTEIN, SA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 (11) :1103-1113
[79]   Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures [J].
Chu, TMG ;
Orton, DG ;
Hollister, SJ ;
Feinberg, SE ;
Halloran, JW .
BIOMATERIALS, 2002, 23 (05) :1283-1293
[80]   Toward Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: 3D Printing Techniques in Regenerative Medicine [J].
Chung, Justin J. ;
Im, Heejung ;
Kim, Soo Hyun ;
Park, Jong Woong ;
Jung, Youngmee .
FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8