Additive manufacturing for biomedical bone implants: Shaping the future of bones

被引:3
作者
Razzaq, Muhammad Hassan [1 ,2 ]
Zaheer, Muhammad Usama [1 ,2 ]
Asghar, Humaira [3 ]
Aktas, O. Cenk [4 ]
Aycan, Mehmet Fatih [1 ,2 ]
Mishra, Yogendra Kumar [3 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Addit Mfg Technol Applicat & Res Ctr EKTAM, TR-06980 Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Mads Clausen Inst, Smart Mat, NanoSYD, Alsion 2, DK-6400 Sonderborg, Denmark
[4] Univ Kiel, Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein UKSH, Dept Orthodont, Arnold Heller Str 3, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D materials printing; Artificial bone printing; Dental implants; Biomimetic lattice structures; Bioactive coatings; OF-THE-ART; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE COATINGS; POROUS SCAFFOLD DESIGN; IN-VIVO PERFORMANCE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; PORE-SIZE; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; POLYCAPROLACTONE SCAFFOLDS; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mser.2025.100931
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Perpetual innovation in technology, materials and processes has ushered in a new era of significant advancements in biomedical implants, which are critical for reestablishing functional capacity for patients affected with skeletal injuries or diseases. Traditional manufacturing methodologies are constrained by lack of customization, suboptimal biocompatibility, and mechanical incompatibility; however, additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing, is revolutionizing biomedical bone implants by addressing these critical challenges. This article provides a historical perspective on AM, an in-depth analysis of its various technologies and evaluates their suitability for producing different types of bone implants, including orthopedic, dental, craniofacial, spinal, joint, and maxillofacial implants. Material selection is a crucial aspect of implant fabrication, encompassing considerations from both the additive manufacturing processes and biocompatibility perspectives, so the use of metals, polymers, ceramics, composites and bioinks in AM is discussed, emphasizing their biocompatibility and mechanical properties. Moreover, this review examines the intricate design considerations for custom implants, including topological optimization, biomimetic designs and the crucial role of CAD and 3D modeling in crafting implants with desired porosity, surface roughness, and mechanical properties followed by surface modification strategies, including the deployment of bioactive coatings and advanced treatment modalities, engineered to augment osseointegration and modulate biological responses for improved implant integration. Furthermore, this review also examines the multifaceted challenges currently impeding the advancement of Additive Manufacturing in bone implant production, including substantial cost implications, pressing demands for novel material development, and the imperative for vigilant process optimization. On top of that, the potential integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is presented as a promising avenue for enhancing design processes, optimizing manufacturing parameters, and improving quality control. In conclusion, this paper highlights the significant advancements that Additive Manufacturing brings to the field of biomedical bone implants. By enabling the creation of customized, high-performance implants tailored to the specific needs of individual patients, AM promises to transform orthopedic care and related medical disciplines.
引用
收藏
页数:56
相关论文
共 706 条
[1]   Biomechanical and bioactivity concepts of polyetheretherketone composites for use in orthopedic implantsa review [J].
Abdullah, Mohamed Ruslan ;
Goharian, Amirhossein ;
Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq Abdul ;
Wahit, Mat Uzir .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2015, 103 (11) :3689-3702
[2]  
Abduo J., 2014, A Comprehensive Review, V40, P758, DOI [10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117, DOI 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117]
[3]  
Abraham Celeste M, 2014, Open Dent J, V8, P50, DOI 10.2174/1874210601408010050
[4]   The earliest document regarding the history of cranioplasty from the Ottoman era [J].
Aciduman, Ahmet ;
Belen, Deniz .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (03) :349-353
[5]   A personalized 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint: From implant design to implantation [J].
Ackland, David C. ;
Robinson, Dale ;
Redhead, Michael ;
Lee, Peter Vee Sin ;
Moskaljuk, Adrian ;
Dimitroulis, George .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2017, 69 :404-411
[6]   Advanced biomaterials in hip joint arthroplasty. A review on polymer and ceramics composites as alternative bearings [J].
Affatato, Saverio ;
Ruggiero, Alessandro ;
Merola, Massimiliano .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2015, 83 :276-283
[7]  
Ahn DG, 2021, INT J PR ENG MAN-GT, V8, P703
[8]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[9]   Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study [J].
Al Muderis, Munjed ;
Khemka, Aditya ;
Lord, Sarah J. ;
Van de Meent, Henk ;
Frolke, Jan Paul M. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (11) :900-909
[10]   MSLattice: A free software for generating uniform and graded lattices based on triply periodic minimal surfaces [J].
Al-Ketan O. ;
Abu Al-Rub R.K. .
Material Design and Processing Communications, 2021, 3 (06)