Impact of general vs. neuraxial anesthesia on neonatal outcomes in non-elective cesarean sections

被引:0
作者
Cocchi, Enrico [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pini, Rita [4 ]
Gallipoli, Antonella [4 ]
Stella, Marcello [1 ]
Antonazzo, Patrizio [5 ]
Marchetti, Federico [2 ,6 ]
Agnoletti, Vanni [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] AUSL Romagna, Bufalini Hosp, Neonatal & Pediat Intens Care Unit, Cesena, Italy
[2] Alma Mater Studiorum Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Precis Med & Genom, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] AUSL Romagna, Bufalini Hosp, Intervent Neuroradiol Unit, Cesena, Italy
[5] AUSL Romagna, Bufalini Hosp, Obstet & Ginecol, Cesena, Italy
[6] Santa Maria Croci Hosp, Pediat & Neonatal Intens Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS | 2025年 / 13卷
关键词
anesthesia; general anesthesia; cesarean section; neonatal outcome; neonatal resuscitation; inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW); respiratory;
D O I
10.3389/fped.2025.1518456
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure, usually performed under neuraxial anesthesia and, more rarely, under general anesthesia. The choice of anesthesia in cesarean sections can significantly influence neonatal outcomes, especially in urgent and emergency cases. Previous studies have shown mixed results, often confounded by the inclusion of both elective and emergency cesarean section cases, varying statistical methods, and a focus solely on resuscitation immediate-term neonatal outcomes. Objective: This study aims to use robust statistical methods to evaluate the impact of anesthesia type on immediate and longer-term neonatal outcomes in urgent and emergency cesarean section cases, where additional detrimental factors might influence this relationship. Methods: We analyzed 395 women who underwent non-elective cesarean sections between 2021 and 2023. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) served to focus on the role of anesthesia type eliminating confounding variables effect, in simulated randomized controlled trial conditions. Results: General anesthesia increases odds of neonatal resuscitation (OR 6.1, p < 0.001), NICU admission (OR 1.8, p: 0.04), and a 15% lower Apgar score at 1 min (p: 0.02). General anesthesia also increased NICU admission rate for respiratory insufficiency (OR 7.6, p < 0.001), the need for oxygen (OR 4.8, p: 0.003) and CPAP (OR 3.6, p < 0.001) in NICU. Negative controls and consistent sensitivity analyses further validated the robustness of our findings. Conclusion: General anesthesia in non-elective cesarean sections is associated with worse neonatal outcomes, extending beyond the resuscitation phase to sustained NICU morbidity. Our study provides novel insights into the specific neonatal resuscitation maneuvers required when general anesthesia is used, enhancing clinicians preparedness for managing high-risk deliveries. These findings underscore the critical importance of anesthesia choice, advocate for the preference of neuraxial techniques, and highlight the need for further research into long-term neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
    Al-Husban, Naser
    Elmuhtaseb, Mohammad Sami
    Al-Husban, Hedaieh
    Nabhan, Mohammed
    Abuhalaweh, Hamza
    Alkhatib, Yasmine Mohamed
    Yousef, Maysa
    Aloran, Bayan
    Elyyan, Yousef
    Alghazo, Asma
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 13 : 141 - 152
  • [2] Epidural lidocaine-bicarbonate-adrenaline vs levobupivacaine for emergency Caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial
    Allam, J.
    Malhotra, S.
    Hemingway, C.
    Yentis, S. M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 63 (03) : 243 - 249
  • [3] Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology
    Apfelbaum J.L.
    Hawkins J.L.
    Agarkar M.
    Bucklin B.A.
    Connis R.T.
    Gambling D.R.
    Mhyre J.
    Nickinovich D.G.
    Sherman H.
    Tsen L.C.
    Yaghmour E.T.A.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 124 (02) : 270 - 300
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2024, Anaesthesia for Caesarean DeliveryBest Practices
  • [5] asahq, Statement on pain during cesarean delivery
  • [6] A real-world comparison of tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T cells in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma
    Bachy, Emmanuel
    Le Gouill, Steven
    Di Blasi, Roberta
    Sesques, Pierre
    Manson, Guillaume
    Cartron, Guillaume
    Beauvais, David
    Roulin, Louise
    Gros, Francois Xavier
    Rubio, Marie Therese
    Bories, Pierre
    Bay, Jacques Olivier
    Llorente, Cristina Castilla
    Choquet, Sylvain
    Casasnovas, Rene-Olivier
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Guidez, Stephanie
    Joris, Magalie
    Loschi, Michael
    Carras, Sylvain
    Abraham, Julie
    Chauchet, Adrien
    La Rochelle, Laurianne Drieu
    Deau-Fischer, Benedicte
    Hermine, Olivier
    Gastinne, Thomas
    Tudesq, Jean Jacques
    Gat, Elodie
    Broussais, Florence
    Thieblemont, Catherine
    Houot, Roch
    Morschhauser, Franck
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2022, 28 (10) : 2145 - 2154
  • [7] Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression
    Bursac, Zoran
    Gauss, C. Heath
    Williams, David Keith
    Hosmer, David W.
    [J]. SOURCE CODE FOR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01):
  • [8] An introduction to inverse probability of treatment weighting in observational research
    Chesnaye, Nicholas C.
    Stel, Vianda S.
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    Fu, Edouard L.
    Zoccali, Carmine
    Jager, Kitty J.
    [J]. CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [9] Cocchi E., Riptw
  • [10] Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey
    Desai, Neel
    Gardner, Andrew
    Carvalho, Brendan
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 2019