Use of surrogate endpoints in health technology assessment: a review of selected NICE technology appraisals in oncology

被引:1
作者
Wheaton, Lorna [1 ]
Bujkiewicz, Sylwia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Biostat Res Grp, Leicester, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
surrogate endpoint; health technology assessment; decision making; oncology; statistical methodology; TRIALS; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462325000017
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Surrogate endpoints, used to substitute for and predict final clinical outcomes, are increasingly being used to support submissions to health technology assessment agencies. The increase in the use of surrogate endpoints has been accompanied by literature describing the frameworks and statistical methods to ensure their robust validation. The aim of this review was to assess how surrogate endpoints have recently been used in oncology technology appraisals by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales.Methods This article identifies technology appraisals in oncology published by NICE between February 2022 and May 2023. Data are extracted on the use and validation of surrogate endpoints including purpose, evidence base, and methods used.Results Of the 47 technology appraisals in oncology available for review, 18 (38 percent) utilized surrogate endpoints, with 37 separate surrogate endpoints being discussed. However, the evidence supporting the validity of the surrogate relationship varied significantly across putative surrogate relationships with 11 providing randomized controlled trial evidence, 7 providing evidence from observational studies, 12 based on the clinical opinion, and 7 providing no evidence for the use of surrogate endpoints.Conclusions This review supports the assertion that surrogate endpoints are frequently used in oncology technology appraisals in England and Wales and despite the increasing availability of statistical methods and guidance on appropriate validation of surrogate endpoints, this review highlights that use and validation of surrogate endpoints can vary between technology appraisals, which can lead to uncertainty in decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The health technology assessment adaptation toolkit: Description and use [J].
Turner, Sheila ;
Chase, Deborah L. ;
Milne, Ruairidh ;
Cook, Andrew ;
Hicks, Nicholas J. ;
Rosten, Claire ;
Payne, Liz ;
Coles, Suzanne ;
Bell, Eleanor .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 :37-41
[42]   Value of information analysis for use in health technology assessment [J].
Havlik, J. ;
Jurickova, I. .
WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 :1371-1374
[43]   Sedimentation of health technology assessment in hospitals: a scoping review [J].
da Silva Galdino, Johnathan Portela ;
Camargo, Erika Barbosa ;
Silva Elias, Flavia Tavares .
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2021, 37 (09)
[44]   ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY: A SCOPING REVIEW [J].
Polisena, Julie ;
De Angelis, Gino ;
Kaunelis, David ;
Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Inaki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (03) :317-326
[45]   Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: A descriptive review [J].
DeJean, Deirdre ;
Giacomini, Mita ;
Schwartz, Lisa ;
Miller, Fiona A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 (04) :463-469
[46]   How Least Developed to Lower-Middle Income Countries Use Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review [J].
Falkowski, Anna ;
Ciminata, Giorgio ;
Manca, Francesco ;
Bouttell, Janet ;
Jaiswal, Nishant ;
Farhana Binti Kamaruzaman, Hanin ;
Hollingworth, Samantha ;
Al-Adwan, Mariana ;
Heggie, Robert ;
Putri, Septiara ;
Rana, Dikshyanta ;
Mukelabai Simangolwa, Warren ;
Grieve, Eleanor .
PATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 117 (02) :104-119
[47]   Health Technology Assessment [J].
Rozmarinova, Jana .
SMART GOVERNMENTS, REGIONS AND CITIES, 2020, :223-233
[48]   Analysis ReDS technology by use Health Technology Assessment modelling, quantity and optimization methods [J].
Yagudina, Roza ;
Kulikov, Andrey ;
Borodin, Alex ;
Serpik, Vyacheslav ;
Protsenko, Marina ;
Vygodchikova, Irina .
PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2025, 23 (01)
[49]   The application of health technology assessment in osteoporosis [J].
Kanis, John A. ;
Hiligsmann, Mickael .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2014, 28 (06) :895-910
[50]   Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom [J].
Drummond, Michael ;
Banta, David .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 :178-181