Use of surrogate endpoints in health technology assessment: a review of selected NICE technology appraisals in oncology

被引:1
作者
Wheaton, Lorna [1 ]
Bujkiewicz, Sylwia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Biostat Res Grp, Leicester, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
surrogate endpoint; health technology assessment; decision making; oncology; statistical methodology; TRIALS; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462325000017
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Surrogate endpoints, used to substitute for and predict final clinical outcomes, are increasingly being used to support submissions to health technology assessment agencies. The increase in the use of surrogate endpoints has been accompanied by literature describing the frameworks and statistical methods to ensure their robust validation. The aim of this review was to assess how surrogate endpoints have recently been used in oncology technology appraisals by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales.Methods This article identifies technology appraisals in oncology published by NICE between February 2022 and May 2023. Data are extracted on the use and validation of surrogate endpoints including purpose, evidence base, and methods used.Results Of the 47 technology appraisals in oncology available for review, 18 (38 percent) utilized surrogate endpoints, with 37 separate surrogate endpoints being discussed. However, the evidence supporting the validity of the surrogate relationship varied significantly across putative surrogate relationships with 11 providing randomized controlled trial evidence, 7 providing evidence from observational studies, 12 based on the clinical opinion, and 7 providing no evidence for the use of surrogate endpoints.Conclusions This review supports the assertion that surrogate endpoints are frequently used in oncology technology appraisals in England and Wales and despite the increasing availability of statistical methods and guidance on appropriate validation of surrogate endpoints, this review highlights that use and validation of surrogate endpoints can vary between technology appraisals, which can lead to uncertainty in decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Surrogate endpoints in assessment of clinical efficacy and safety of oncology drugs - analysis of AHTAPol recommendations [J].
Wladysiuk, Magdalena ;
Szmurlo, Daria ;
Wojciechowski, Piotr .
ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 10 (03) :138-145
[22]   Justifying the source of external comparators in single-arm oncology healt technology submissions: a review of NICE and PBAC assessments h [J].
Appiah, Katherine ;
Rizzo, Maria ;
Sarri, Grammati ;
Hernandez, Luis .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (02) :e230140
[23]   A Review of NICE Methods and Processes Across Health Technology Assessment Programmes: Why the Differences and What is the Impact? [J].
Emma Cowles ;
Grace Marsden ;
Amanda Cole ;
Nancy Devlin .
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2017, 15 :469-477
[24]   Practical Use of Early Stage Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices: Systematic Literature Review [J].
Simonova, Mariia ;
Rogalewicz, Vladimir ;
Donin, Gleb ;
Kneppo, Peter .
XV MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING - MEDICON 2019, 2020, 76 :1047-1056
[25]   Health technology assessment: oncology drugs with orphan designation as an example [J].
Claudia Wild .
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 5 (Suppl 1)
[26]   Validity of event-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in haematological malignancy: Review of the literature and health technology assessments [J].
Assouline, Sarit ;
Wiesinger, Adriana ;
Spooner, Clare ;
Jovanovic, Jelena ;
Schlueter, Max .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 175
[27]   The extent and quality of qualitative evidence included in health technology assessments: a review of submissions to NICE and CADTH [J].
Szabo, Shelagh M. ;
Hawkins, Neil S. ;
Germeni, Evi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 40 (01)
[28]   Health Technology Assessment in Oral Health [J].
Esfandiari, Shahrokh ;
Feine, Jocelyne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 :93-100
[29]   ETHICS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [J].
Bellemare, Christian A. ;
Dagenais, Pierre ;
K.-Bedard, Suzanne ;
Beland, Jean-Pierre ;
Bernier, Louise ;
Daniel, Charles-Etienne ;
Gagnon, Hubert ;
Legault, Georges-Auguste ;
Parent, Monelle ;
Patenaude, Johane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (05) :447-457
[30]   The 'NICE' approach to technology assessment: An economics perspective [J].
Birch S. ;
Gafni A. .
Health Care Management Science, 2004, 7 (1) :35-41