Use of surrogate endpoints in health technology assessment: a review of selected NICE technology appraisals in oncology

被引:0
|
作者
Wheaton, Lorna [1 ]
Bujkiewicz, Sylwia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Biostat Res Grp, Leicester, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
surrogate endpoint; health technology assessment; decision making; oncology; statistical methodology; TRIALS; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462325000017
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Surrogate endpoints, used to substitute for and predict final clinical outcomes, are increasingly being used to support submissions to health technology assessment agencies. The increase in the use of surrogate endpoints has been accompanied by literature describing the frameworks and statistical methods to ensure their robust validation. The aim of this review was to assess how surrogate endpoints have recently been used in oncology technology appraisals by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales.Methods This article identifies technology appraisals in oncology published by NICE between February 2022 and May 2023. Data are extracted on the use and validation of surrogate endpoints including purpose, evidence base, and methods used.Results Of the 47 technology appraisals in oncology available for review, 18 (38 percent) utilized surrogate endpoints, with 37 separate surrogate endpoints being discussed. However, the evidence supporting the validity of the surrogate relationship varied significantly across putative surrogate relationships with 11 providing randomized controlled trial evidence, 7 providing evidence from observational studies, 12 based on the clinical opinion, and 7 providing no evidence for the use of surrogate endpoints.Conclusions This review supports the assertion that surrogate endpoints are frequently used in oncology technology appraisals in England and Wales and despite the increasing availability of statistical methods and guidance on appropriate validation of surrogate endpoints, this review highlights that use and validation of surrogate endpoints can vary between technology appraisals, which can lead to uncertainty in decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN ONCOLOGY: A REVIEW OF RECENT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Wissinger, E.
    Koufopoulou, M.
    Fusco, N.
    Stewart, F.
    Oladapo, T.
    Depalma, S.
    Devani, D.
    Rangi, N. D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S265 - S266
  • [2] The use of surrogate endpoints in health technology assessment for oncology drugs
    Lasys, Tomas
    Karinauske, Egle
    Kasciuskeviciute, Skaiste
    Usaite, Akvile
    Stankeviciute, Simona
    Sadauskas, Vladas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 77 (SUPPL 1) : 33 - 33
  • [3] SURROGATE ENDPOINTS USED IN NICE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS FOR ONCOLOGY AND NON-ONCOLOGY INDICATIONS, 2022-23
    Heptinstall, A.
    Adkins, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S331 - S331
  • [4] ADOPTION OF PIECEWISE MODELLING: A REVIEW OF NICE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS IN ONCOLOGY
    Liu, B. L.
    Griffiths, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S356 - S356
  • [5] Surrogate Endpoints in Health Technology Assessment: An International Review of Methodological Guidelines
    Bogdan Grigore
    Oriana Ciani
    Florian Dams
    Carlo Federici
    Saskia de Groot
    Meilin Möllenkamp
    Stefan Rabbe
    Kosta Shatrov
    Antal Zemplenyi
    Rod S. Taylor
    PharmacoEconomics, 2020, 38 : 1055 - 1070
  • [6] Surrogate Endpoints in Health Technology Assessment: An International Review of Methodological Guidelines
    Grigore, Bogdan
    Ciani, Oriana
    Dams, Florian
    Federici, Carlo
    de Groot, Saskia
    Moellenkamp, Meilin
    Rabbe, Stefan
    Shatrov, Kosta
    Zemplenyi, Antal
    Taylor, Rod S.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (10) : 1055 - 1070
  • [7] CURRENT TRENDS IN SURVIVAL EXTRAPOLATION METHODS: A REVIEW OF NICE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS FOR ONCOLOGY DRUGS
    Fernandes, L.
    Tomori, D., V
    Cheng, C. Y.
    Buyukkaramikli, N.
    Holden, J.
    Pan, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S420 - S420
  • [8] A REVIEW OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS: CASE STUDIES IN ONCOLOGY
    Shah, Koonal Kirit
    Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge
    Towse, Adrian
    Smyth, Emily Nash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 29 (01) : 101 - 109
  • [9] A REVIEW OF NICE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS IN ONCOLOGY USING SINGLE ARM TRIALS (SAT) EVIDENCE
    Alexiou, D.
    Chatzitheofilou, I
    Blanque, Pi A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S224 - S224
  • [10] INCORPORATING EXTERNAL DATA TO INFORM OVERALL SURVIVAL EXTRAPOLATION: A REVIEW OF NICE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS FOR ONCOLOGY DRUGS
    Cheng, C. Y.
    Tomori, D., V
    Fernandes, L.
    Buyukkaramikli, N.
    Holden, J.
    Pan, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S394 - S394