CFO Power and Audit Quality

被引:1
作者
Alyafai, Ayoob [1 ]
Islam, Ariful [2 ]
Singh, Harjinder [2 ]
Sultana, Nigar [2 ]
机构
[1] Taibah Univ, Coll Business Adm, Accounting Dept, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Accounting Econ & Finance, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS RISK; ACCRUALS; FEES; COMPENSATION; COMMITTEE; PERFORMANCE; GENDER; CEO;
D O I
10.1111/auar.12436
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Due to their primary responsibilities over the financial reporting process, chief financial officers (CFOs) accumulate critical knowledge, and therefore power, within organisations. We examine whether such powerful CFOs use their influence to increase or decrease audit quality. Using a wide range of proxies for audit quality and a comprehensive measure of CFO power, we find that powerful CFOs are associated with lower levels of audit quality, suggesting that powerful CFOs pursue an agenda of self-interest. Our results are robust to alternative specifications of our variables, including endogeneity. As a result of our findings, we contribute not only to the academic literature but also provide useful research outcomes, such as aiding with legislation to strengthen corporate governance structures within firms to monitor such powerful CFOs. As a result of primary responsibilities over the financial reporting process, chief financial officers (CFOs) accumulate critical knowledge, and therefore power, within organisations. We examine whether such powerful CFOs use their influence to increase or decrease audit quality. we find that powerful CFOs are associated with lower levels of audit quality suggesting that powerful CFOs pursue an agenda of self-interest.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 325
页数:20
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees [J].
Abbott, LJ ;
Parker, S ;
Peters, GF ;
Raghunandan, K .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2003, 22 (02) :17-32
[2]  
Aier J., 2005, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V19, P123, DOI DOI 10.2308/ACCH.2005.19.3.123
[3]   What Drives Auditor Selection? [J].
Almer, Elizabeth Dreike ;
Philbrick, Donna R. ;
Rupley, Kathleen Hertz .
CURRENT ISSUES IN AUDITING, 2014, 8 (01) :A26-A42
[4]   CONSERVATISM AND AUDITOR-CLIENT NEGOTIATIONS [J].
ANTLE, R ;
NALEBUFF, B .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1991, 29 :31-54
[5]   Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections [J].
Aobdia, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2019, 67 (01) :144-174
[6]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[7]  
Asare S.K., 2010, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V17, P539
[8]  
Australian Securities and Investments Commission, 2017, DIRECTORS FINANCIAL
[9]   Audited financial reporting and voluntary disclosure as complements: A test of the Confirmation Hypothesis [J].
Ball, Ray ;
Jayaraman, Sudarshan ;
Shivakumar, Lakshmanan .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (1-2) :136-166
[10]   Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality [J].
Balsam, S ;
Krishnan, J ;
Yang, JS .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2003, 22 (02) :71-97