World Order from Birmingham Jail

被引:0
作者
Hurd, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
international order; world order; rule of law; Martin Luther King Jr; international disorder;
D O I
10.1017/S0892679424000194
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this essay, I use Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter from Birmingham Jail to open questions about international order and disorder. The idea of order is central to modern discourse on international politics, but the concept is often ill defined and ambiguous. King's ideas clarify three issues: First, is order understood as an objective condition of a system or a political judgment about its suitability for social life? Second, does compliance with law lead naturally to order? And third, is order always preferable to disorder? The way King answers each question is somewhat different than the conventional wisdom in international relations. IR scholars typically assume that international order is a universal good and that compliance with law enhancxes it. King highlights the gap between order as defined by the authorities in Alabama and his own lived experience. I use the difference to map the terrain of scholarship on international order and disorder and to draw implications for concepts, research methods, and political judgment. Copyright © The Author(s), 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 161
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Allan Bentley B., 2018, Taboo
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1963, Birmingham NewsApril 13
[3]  
Bell Duncan., 2019, Reordering the World: Essays on Liberalism and Empire
[4]  
Benton Lauren, 2018, Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800-1850
[5]  
Block-Lieb S, 2015, CAMB STUD LAW SOC, P75
[6]  
Bull Hedley., 1977, ANARCHICAL SOC STUDY
[7]  
Carr According to E. H., 1964, The Twenty-Years Crisis, 1919-1939, P64
[8]  
Dunoff Jeffrey L., 2019, The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline, P183
[9]  
Franck Thomas, 2009, Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks, P174
[10]  
Hathaway Oona Anne, 2005, Foundations of International Law and Politics, P196