The hidden development patterns of Africa and their sustainability correlations

被引:3
作者
Shaker, Richard Ross [1 ,2 ]
Mackay, Brian R. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Sustainable Resources Management, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] GEOECO Inc, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[3] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Spatial Anal, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Environm Appl Sci & Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Hidden development; Multivariate analysis; Planetary boundaries; Regional development; Sustainable development goals; Sustainability indicators; INDICATORS; BIODIVERSITY; ANTHROPOCENE; POPULATION; RESILIENCE; LANDSCAPE; FUTURE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.indic.2024.100474
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With steady population growth and formidable development issues, understanding Africa is crucial for reaching global sustainability. Through policy support, societies have embraced indicators and their composite indices as tools to create benchmark initiatives, assess current conditions, and help set future development targets. Responding, a paralyzing amount of these metrics are now available for decision-makers, practitioners, and researchers to choose from causing difficulties during their applied use. Further, the number of underlying development dimensions essential for capturing all aspects of sustainability remains undetermined. Building upon other continental studies, this research first condensed and described a set of 44 multi-metric sustainability indices across 52 African nations. A factor analysis uncovered 11 significant sustainable development dimensions (factors) that conveyed over 79% of the total variation of the original 44 indices. Next, the 11 latent dimensions were combined (aggregated) into a mega-index of sustainable development (MISD). Lastly, Ward's cluster analysis was used to create country-bundles of similarity from the 11 factors. The four strongest hidden dimensions expressed: (F1) human well-being synergies; (F2) governance and liberty; (F3) economic stability; (F4) happiness and innovation. The human well-being synergies dimension (F1) explained over one-third of the total variance, and had greatest improved conditions in countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. MISD ranked Namibia best, then Ghana, Gabon, Kenya, and Zambia; Seychelles ranked worst, then Eritrea, Burundi, Comoros, and Mauritania. Cluster analysis revealed a six-bundle solution. This cross-country analysis spotlights the underrepresentation of planetary boundaries within existing development indices. Lastly, favorable development dimensions were rarely found spatially concordant.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]   The future of migration, human populations, and global health in the Anthropocene Comment [J].
Abubakar, Ibrahim .
LANCET, 2020, 396 (10258) :1133-1134
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, OEDC DAC Peer Review of the Netherlands 2017, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264257658-EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Human development reports
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Global Gender Gap Report 2018
[5]  
[Anonymous], Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL COMPETITIVENE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Rwanda Human Capital Index 2020: Human Capital Project-October 2020
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Sustainable Development Goals
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CORRUPTION PERCEPTIO