The hidden development patterns of Africa and their sustainability correlations

被引:2
作者
Shaker, Richard Ross [1 ,2 ]
Mackay, Brian R. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Sustainable Resources Management, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] GEOECO Inc, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[3] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Spatial Anal, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Environm Appl Sci & Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Hidden development; Multivariate analysis; Planetary boundaries; Regional development; Sustainable development goals; Sustainability indicators; INDICATORS; BIODIVERSITY; ANTHROPOCENE; POPULATION; RESILIENCE; LANDSCAPE; FUTURE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.indic.2024.100474
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With steady population growth and formidable development issues, understanding Africa is crucial for reaching global sustainability. Through policy support, societies have embraced indicators and their composite indices as tools to create benchmark initiatives, assess current conditions, and help set future development targets. Responding, a paralyzing amount of these metrics are now available for decision-makers, practitioners, and researchers to choose from causing difficulties during their applied use. Further, the number of underlying development dimensions essential for capturing all aspects of sustainability remains undetermined. Building upon other continental studies, this research first condensed and described a set of 44 multi-metric sustainability indices across 52 African nations. A factor analysis uncovered 11 significant sustainable development dimensions (factors) that conveyed over 79% of the total variation of the original 44 indices. Next, the 11 latent dimensions were combined (aggregated) into a mega-index of sustainable development (MISD). Lastly, Ward's cluster analysis was used to create country-bundles of similarity from the 11 factors. The four strongest hidden dimensions expressed: (F1) human well-being synergies; (F2) governance and liberty; (F3) economic stability; (F4) happiness and innovation. The human well-being synergies dimension (F1) explained over one-third of the total variance, and had greatest improved conditions in countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. MISD ranked Namibia best, then Ghana, Gabon, Kenya, and Zambia; Seychelles ranked worst, then Eritrea, Burundi, Comoros, and Mauritania. Cluster analysis revealed a six-bundle solution. This cross-country analysis spotlights the underrepresentation of planetary boundaries within existing development indices. Lastly, favorable development dimensions were rarely found spatially concordant.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 143 条
  • [1] Abubakar I., The future of migration, human populations, and global health in the Anthropocene, Lancet, 396, pp. 1133-1134, (2020)
  • [2] Arieff A., Global Economic Crisis: Impact on Sub-saharan Africa and Global Policy Responses, (2010)
  • [3] Babcicky P., Rethinking the foundations of sustainability measurement: the limitations of the environmental sustainability index (ESI), Soc. Indicat. Res., 113, pp. 133-157, (2013)
  • [4] Bell S., Morse S., Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?, (2012)
  • [5] Benson M.H., Craig R.K., The End of Sustainability: Resilience and the Future of Environmental Governance in the Anthropocene, Illustrated Edition, (2017)
  • [6] Bohringer C., Jochem P.E.P., Measuring the immeasurable — a survey of sustainability indices, Ecol. Econ., 63, pp. 1-8, (2007)
  • [7] Bourguignon F., The Globalization of Inequality, (2015)
  • [8] World Giving Index 2016: A Global View of Giving Trends, (2016)
  • [9] Campbell S., Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 62, pp. 296-312, (1996)
  • [10] Ceballos G., Ehrlich P.R., Dirzo R., Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, pp. E6089-E6096, (2017)