Prize-Based Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among People With HIV: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial

被引:2
|
作者
Ledgerwood, David M. [1 ]
Lundahl, Leslie H. [1 ]
Greenwald, Mark K. [1 ]
Cohn, Jonathan [2 ]
Arfken, Cynthia L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Ste 2C,3901 Chrysler Dr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; TOBACCO USE; SMOKERS; INTERVENTIONS; ABSTINENCE; DEPENDENCE; VARENICLINE; EFFICACY; USERS;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntae243
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Contingency management (CM) is an incentive-based approach that has demonstrated efficacy for smoking cessation in various populations. There is an unmet need for feasible and effective smoking cessation interventions in people with HIV (PWH). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prize-based CM for smoking cessation in PWH using a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomization Trial (SMART) design selected to tailor intervention intensity based on early treatment response. Methods: During phase I, 129 participants were randomly assigned to high-magnitude prize CM (HM-CM) or standard of care (SoC) for 4 weeks. Participants who did not reduce smoking were randomized in phase II to continued counseling with HM-CM plus monitoring support or only continued monitoring support for 8 weeks. Participants who reduced smoking were randomized to booster monitoring with low-magnitude CM or no additional care. Outcomes were biochemically verified smoking reduction and 7-day abstinence prevalence at posttreatment, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Results: Phase I responders (based on biochemical indicators of smoking reduction) were significantly less likely to return to smoking (during treatment and at 6 and 12 months) if they received low-magnitude incentives. Notably, initial exposure to CM versus SoC did not increase the rate of phase I response, and high-magnitude incentives later in treatment did not lead to greater smoking cessation for early-treatment nonresponders. Conclusions: Weekly CM sessions in the first 4 weeks of smoking cessation intervention did not perform significantly better than SoC. However, brief booster CM sessions aimed at maintaining early smoking cessation hold clinical promise and warrant further investigation. Implications: This represents the first trial to examine the use of CM for smoking cessation among PWH within the context of a SMART design.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 902
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Baseline data of a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (STEP study)
    Hartmann, Jessica A.
    Nelson, Barnaby
    Amminger, Gunther Paul
    Spark, Jessica
    Yuen, Hok Pan
    Kerr, Melissa J.
    Polari, Andrea
    Wallis, Nicky
    Blasioli, Julie
    Dixon, Lisa
    Carter, Cameron
    Loewy, Rachel
    Niendam, Tara A.
    Shumway, Martha
    McGorry, Patrick D.
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 16 (10) : 1130 - 1142
  • [42] Peer navigation for smoking cessation in smokers with HIV: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
    Cioe, Patricia A.
    Pinkston, Megan
    Tashima, Karen T.
    Kahler, Christopher W.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 110
  • [43] Self-Incentives Uniquely Boost Cessation in Community-Based Stop Smoking Programs: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Brown, Emma M.
    Smith, Debbie M.
    Armitage, Christopher J.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (05) : 442 - 452
  • [44] QuitSMART Utah: an implementation study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multi-level Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial to increase Reach and Impact of tobacco cessation treatment in Community Health Centers
    Fernandez, Maria E.
    Schlechter, Chelsey R.
    Del Fiol, Guilherme
    Gibson, Bryan
    Kawamoto, Kensaku
    Siaperas, Tracey
    Pruhs, Alan
    Greene, Tom
    Nahum-Shani, Inbal
    Schulthies, Sandra
    Nelson, Marci
    Bohner, Claudia
    Kramer, Heidi
    Borbolla, Damian
    Austin, Sharon
    Weir, Charlene
    Walker, Timothy W.
    Lam, Cho Y.
    Wetter, David W.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [45] RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING TWO TREATMENT STRATEGIES USING PRIZE-BASED REINFORCEMENT OF ABSTINENCE IN COCAINE AND OPIATE USERS
    Preston, Kenzie L.
    Ghitza, Udi E.
    Schmittner, John P.
    Schroeder, Jennifer R.
    Epstein, David H.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2008, 41 (04) : 551 - 563
  • [46] Patient navigation and financial incentives to promote smoking cessation in an underserved primary care population: A randomized controlled trial protocol
    Quintiliani, Lisa M.
    Russinova, Zlatka L.
    Bloch, Philippe P.
    Ve Truong
    Xuan, Ziming
    Pbert, Lori
    Lasser, Karen E.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 45 : 449 - 457
  • [47] Smoking cessation among HIV smokers: Experience of a French hospital-based smoking cessation service
    Choulika, S.
    Le Faoub, A. -L.
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2017, 43 (02): : 110 - 113
  • [48] Effect of smoking cessation interventions on abstinence and tuberculosis treatment outcomes among newly diagnosed patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Khan, Muhammad Tahir
    Zaheer, Sidra
    Amar, Washdev
    Shafique, Kashif
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (04):
  • [49] Evaluating the Efficacy of Automated Smoking Treatment for People With HIV: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vidrine, Damon J.
    Bui, Thanh C.
    Businelle, Michael S.
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Sutton, Steven K.
    Shahani, Lokesh
    Hoover, Diana Stewart
    Bowles, Kristina
    Vidrine, Jennifer, I
    Vidrine, Damon J.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (11):
  • [50] Randomized Trial of Interventions for Smoking Cessation Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Mental Illness
    Brunette, Mary F.
    Pratt, Sarah, I
    Bartels, Stephen J.
    Scherer, Emily A.
    Sigmon, Stacey C.
    Ferron, Joelle C.
    Santos, Meghan
    Williams, Gail E.
    Kosydar, Samuel
    Wolfe, Rosemarie S.
    Lotz, Doris
    Capuchino, Kelley
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2018, 69 (03) : 274 - 280