Direct anterior and direct lateral approach in patients with femoral neck fractures receiving a total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

被引：0
作者：
Hoseth, John Magne [1 ,2 ]
Froseth, A. A. E. Tommy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lian, oystein Bjerkestrand [1 ,3 ]
Myklebust, Tor age [4 ,5 ]
Husby, Otto Schnell [1 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Kristiansund Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hlth More & Romsdal HF, Kristiansand, Norway
[2] NTNU, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[3] NTNU, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Hlth More & Romsdal HF, Clin Res Unit, Alesund, Norway
[5] Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
来源：
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA | 2025年 / 96卷
关键词：
CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; FORGOTTEN JOINT SCORE; BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY; FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY; GO TEST; COMPLICATIONS; REPLACEMENT; POSTERIOR; RISK;
D O I：
10.2340/17453674.2025.42847
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background and purpose - The optimal approach to the hip joint in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (dFNF) receiving a total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. We compared the direct lateral approach (DLA) with the direct anterior approach (DAA) primarily on Timed Up and Go (TUG), and secondarily on the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EQ5D-5L, and the EQ5D-VAS. Methods - Between 2018 and 2023, we conducted a randomized controlled trial including elderly patients with dFNFs treated with THA. The primary outcome was the difference in TUG at 6 weeks postoperatively. Key secondary outcomes were TUG at 2, 12, and at 52 weeks postoperatively, and FJS, OHS, EQ5D-5L, and EQ5D-VAS at 2, 6, 12, and at 52 weeks postoperatively. Results - 130 patients with a mean age of 78.6 (standard deviation 1.2) were allocated to DAA (n = 64) or DLA (n = 66). There was no statistically significant difference in TUG times at 6 weeks postoperatively between the DAA and the DLA, 16.0 s (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.2-18.7) vs 17.8 s (CI 15.1-20.4), estimated mean difference -1.8 s (CI -5.7 to 2.0). However, patients who underwent DAA had a significantly higher FJS at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Conclusion - Among elderly patients with dFNF we found no difference between DAA or DLA regarding crude mobility as demonstrated with the TUG test, but patients treated with DAA showed better outcomes in the FJS in the early post-fracture period though not at 52 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码：73 / 79
页数：7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Singh V, Bieganowski T, Huang S, Karia R, Davidovitch R I, Schwar-zkopf R., The Forgotten Joint Score patient-acceptable symptom state following primary total hip arthroplasty, Bone Jt Open, 3, 4, pp. 307-313, (2022)
  • [22] Freigang V, Weber J, Mueller K, Pfeifer C, Worlicek M, Alt V, Et al., Evaluation of joint awareness after acetabular fracture: validation of the Forgotten Joint Score according to the COSMIN checklist protocol, World J Orthop, 12, 2, pp. 69-81, (2021)
  • [23] Anakwe R E, Middleton S D, Jenkins P J, Butler A P, Aitken S A, Keating J F, Et al., Total hip replacement in patients with hip fracture: a matched cohort study, J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 73, 3, pp. 738-742, (2012)
  • [24] Beckmann M, Bruun-Olsen V, Pripp A H, Bergland A, Smith T, Hei-berg K E., Recovery and prediction of physical function 1 year following hip fracture, Physiother Res Int, 27, 3, (2022)
  • [25] Parsons N, Griffin X L, Achten J, Costa M L., Outcome assessment after hip fracture: is EQ-5D the answer?, Bone Joint Res, 3, 3, pp. 69-75, (2014)
  • [26] Longo U G, De Salvatore S, Piergentili I, Indiveri A, Di Naro C, San-tamaria G, Et al., Total hip arthroplasty: minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the Forgotten Joint Score 12, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18, 5, (2021)
  • [27] Ugland T O, Haugeberg G, Svenningsen S, Ugland S H, Berg O H, Pripp A H, Et al., High risk of positive Trendelenburg test after using the direct lateral approach to the hip compared with the anterolateral approach: a single-centre, randomized trial in patients with femoral neck fracture, Bone Joint J, 101-b, 7, pp. 793-799, (2019)
  • [28] Saxer F, Studer P, Jakob M, Suhm N, Rosenthal R, Dell-Kuster S, Et al., Minimally invasive anterior muscle-sparing versus a transgluteal approach for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomised controlled trial including 190 elderly patients, BMC Geriatr, 18, 1, (2018)
  • [29] Innocenti M, Cozzi Lepri A, Civinini A, Mondanelli N, Matassi F, Stimolo D, Et al., Functional outcomes of anterior-based muscle sparing approach compared to direct lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty following acute femoral neck fractures, Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 14, (2023)
  • [30] Bucs G, Dande A, Patczai B, Sebestyen A, Almasi R, Not L G, Et al., Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly, Injury, 52, pp. S37-s43, (2021)
1234