Development and Temporal Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Clinical Deterioration

被引:3
作者
Foote, Henry P. [1 ]
Shaikh, Zohaib [3 ,6 ]
Witt, Daniel [3 ,7 ]
Shen, Tong [4 ]
Ratliff, William [3 ]
Shi, Harvey [3 ]
Gao, Michael [3 ]
Nichols, Marshall [3 ]
Sendak, Mark [3 ]
Balu, Suresh [3 ]
Osborne, Karen [5 ]
Kumar, Karan R. [2 ]
Jackson, Kimberly [2 ]
McCrary, Andrew W. [1 ]
Li, Jennifer S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Div Pediat Cardiol, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Pediat Crit Care Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Duke Inst Hlth Innovat, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Durham, NC USA
[6] Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
EARLY WARNING SYSTEM; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; SCORE; MORTALITY; CHILDREN; IMPACT; NEED;
D O I
10.1542/hpeds.2023-007308
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES Early warning scores detecting clinical deterioration in pediatric inpatients have wide-ranging performance and use a limited number of clinical features. This study developed a machine learning model leveraging multiple static and dynamic clinical features from the electronic health record to predict the composite outcome of unplanned transfer to the ICU within 24 hours and inpatient mortality within 48 hours in hospitalized children.METHODS Using a retrospective development cohort of 17 630 encounters across 10 388 patients, 2 machine learning models (light gradient boosting machine [LGBM] and random forest) were trained on 542 features and compared with our institutional Pediatric Early Warning Score (I-PEWS).RESULTS The LGBM model significantly outperformed I-PEWS based on receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the composite outcome of ICU transfer or mortality for both internal validation and temporal validation cohorts (AUROC 0.785 95% confidence interval [0.780-0.791] vs 0.708 [0.701-0.715] for temporal validation) as well as lead-time before deterioration events (median 11 hours vs 3 hours; P = .004). However, LGBM performance as evaluated by precision recall curve was lesser in the temporal validation cohort with associated decreased positive predictive value (6% vs 29%) and increased number needed to evaluate (17 vs 3) compared with I-PEWS.CONCLUSIONS Our electronic health record based machine learning model demonstrated improved AUROC and lead-time in predicting clinical deterioration in pediatric inpatients 24 to 48 hours in advance compared with I-PEWS. Further work is needed to optimize model positive predictive value to allow for integration into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 20
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
    Lin, Pei-Chen
    Chen, Kuo-Tai
    Chen, Huan-Chieh
    Islam, Md Mohaimenul
    Lin, Ming-Chin
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [22] Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting post-stroke epilepsy
    Yu, Yue
    Chen, Zhibin
    Yang, Yong
    Zhang, Jiajun
    Wang, Yan
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2024, 205
  • [23] Development and validation of a deep learning model to predict the survival of patients in ICU
    Tang, Hai
    Jin, Zhuochen
    Deng, Jiajun
    She, Yunlang
    Zhong, Yifan
    Sun, Weiyan
    Ren, Yijiu
    Cao, Nan
    Chen, Chang
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 29 (09) : 1567 - 1576
  • [24] Development and Validation of Clinical Diagnostic Model for Girls with Central Precocious Puberty: Machine-learning Approaches
    Quynh Thi Vu Huynh
    Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le
    Huang, Shih-Yi
    Ban Tran Ho
    Tru Huy Vu
    Hong Thi Minh Pham
    An Le Pham
    Hou, Jia-Woei
    Ngan Thi Kim Nguyen
    Chen, Yang Ching
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [25] Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
    Valsaraj, Akshay
    Kalmady, Sunil Vasu
    Sharma, Vaibhav
    Frost, Matthew
    Sun, Weijie
    Sepehrvand, Nariman
    Ong, Marcus
    Equilbec, Cyril
    Dyck, Jason R. B.
    Anderson, Todd
    Becher, Harald
    Weeks, Sarah
    Tromp, Jasper
    Hung, Chung-Lieh
    Ezekowitz, Justin A.
    Kaul, Padma
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2023, 90
  • [26] Development and validation of a deep learning model to predict survival of patients with esophageal cancer
    Huang, Chen
    Dai, Yongmei
    Chen, Qianshun
    Chen, Hongchao
    Lin, Yuanfeng
    Wu, Jingyu
    Xu, Xunyu
    Chen, Xiao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [27] Development and validation of a machine learning-based model to predict survival in patients with cirrhosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
    Da, Binlin
    Chen, Huan
    Wu, Wei
    Guo, Wuhua
    Zhou, Anru
    Yin, Qin
    Gao, Jun
    Chen, Junhui
    Xiao, Jiangqiang
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Ming
    Zhuge, Yuzheng
    Zhang, Feng
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2025, 79
  • [28] Development and validation of machine learning models to predict perioperative transfusion risk for hip fractures in the elderly
    Guo, Jiale
    He, Qionghan
    Li, Yehai
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2024, 56 (01)
  • [29] Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    Yuen, Trevor C.
    Winslow, Christopher
    Meltzer, David O.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Edelson, Dana P.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (02) : 368 - 374
  • [30] Clinical evaluation of a machine learning-based early warning system for patient deterioration
    Verma, Amol A.
    Stukel, Therese A.
    Colacci, Michael
    Bell, Shirley
    Ailon, Jonathan
    Friedrich, Jan O.
    Murray, Joshua
    Kuzulugil, Sebnem
    Yang, Zhen
    Lee, Yuna
    Pou-Prom, Chloe
    Mamdani, Muhammad
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2024, 196 (30) : E1027 - E1037