WELFARE REGIMES OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND THEIR DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

被引:0
作者
Tkacova, Andrea [1 ]
Gavurova, Beata [2 ]
Toth, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Kosice, Fac Econ, Kosice, Slovakia
[2] Tech Univ Kosice, Inst Earth Resources, Fac Min Ecol Proc Control & Geotechnol, Kosice, Slovakia
关键词
welfare regimes; poverty risk gap; income inequality; means; EU countries; candidate countries; STATE; CAPITALISM; INEQUALITY; WORLDS; VARIETIES; FAMILIES; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-3/9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Welfare regimes represent potential approaches to the implementation of redistributive policies worldwide. In European countries, several significant regimes have been identified, including the Conservative, Southern, Social Democratic, Liberal model, the Post-Communist European model, and the Model of the Former USSR. The present study focused on identifying the welfare regimes of EU members and candidate countries and examining whether shifts between these regimes occur over time. The k-means method was employed, generating a different number of clusters for two observed periods: 2013 and 2022 on the sample of 27 member and 4 candidate countries and 2023 on the sample of 27 member countries of EU. The input variables consisted of redistributive indicators focusing on income inequality and the risk of poverty. The analysis results confirmed that countries transitioned between regimes in all observed periods. In the mixed group of member and candidate countries, the number of clusters decreased from five to two. For member countries in 2023, the number of clusters was three, mainly due to the worsening risk of poverty in some countries. Notably, none of the clusters represented a pure form of the originally defined welfare regimes. A significant finding of the study was that all observed EU candidate countries have shifted towards the redistributive policies of EU member states. This shift was noted towards regimes of geographically proximate countries. Within the member countries, however, the adopted measures have also lead to the negative phenomenon of mutual distancing of social regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 174
页数:17
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Global Welfare Regimes A Cluster Analysis [J].
Abu Sharkh, Miriam ;
Gough, Ian .
GLOBAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2010, 10 (01) :27-58
[2]  
Aidukaite J., 2021, Challenges to the Welfare State, P138, DOI [10.4337/9781839106118.00016, DOI 10.4337/9781839106118.00016]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, 3 WORLDS WELFARE CAP
[4]   Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report [J].
Arts, W ;
Gelissen, J .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2002, 12 (02) :137-158
[5]  
Asatiani M, 2017, ECON SOCIOL, V10, P21, DOI 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/2
[6]  
Aspalter Ch., 2020, Ideal Types in Comparative Social Policy
[7]  
Aspalter C, 2017, ROUT INT HANDB, P15
[8]   HOW MANY WORLDS OF WELFARE STATE ATTITUDES ARE THERE? EUROPEAN EXPERIENCES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE OF CROSS-NATIONAL SURVEY RESEARCH [J].
Baranowski, Mariusz ;
Jabkowski, Piotr .
ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 15 (01) :160-177
[9]   Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence [J].
Berg, Andrew ;
Ostry, Jonathan D. ;
Tsangarides, Charalambos G. ;
Yakhshilikov, Yorbol .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2018, 23 (03) :259-305
[10]   Differentiation of welfare regimes: The case of Italy [J].
Bertin, Giovanni ;
Carradore, Marco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (02) :149-160