Endovascular Treatment versus Open Surgical Repair for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Eol [1 ]
Kwon, Tae Won [2 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg,Bucheon Hosp, 170 Jomaru Ro, Bucheon 14584, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Surg, Guro Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Iliac aneurysm; Endovascular procedures; Open surgery; Complication; Mortality; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5758/vsi.240041
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been shown to be effective and safe for isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs). However, concerns remain regarding the lack of consideration to recent advances in perioperative care and surgical techniques, as well as a significant number of re-interventions with EVT. This study compares the outcomes of open surgical repair (OSR) and EVT using recent clinical data. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients who underwent OSR or EVT for isolated degenerative IAAs between January 2007 and December 2018. Primary outcomes were procedure time, number of transfusions during admission, length of hospital stay, complications, and number of preserved internal iliac arteries. Secondary outcomes included all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, and re-intervention rates. Results: Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent treatment for isolated IAAs (25 underwent OSR and 33 underwent EVT), with a median follow-up of 75 months (range: 39-133 months). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for a lower mean age in the OSR group than in the EVT group (66.0 +/- 8.2 vs. 73.1 +/- 8.6, P=0.003). Both groups had a mild risk of comorbidity severity score. Early complications (within 30 days of the procedure) occurred more frequently in the OSR group, though not statistically significant (24.0% vs. 6.1%, P=0.07). Late complications, including sac expansion and thrombotic occlusion, were significantly more common in the EVT group (15.2% vs. 0%, P=0.04). Re-intervention rate was higher in the EVT group but not statistically significant (9.1% vs. 4.0%, P=0.44). No significant differences were observed in major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality between the groups (P=0.66 and P=0.27), and there were no aneurysm-related deaths. Conclusion: For patients with mild risk factors, EVT does not offer a survival or re-intervention advantages over OSR in the treatment of isolated IAAs. However, EVT is associated with an increased risk of late complications. Although larger randomized studies are necessary, OSR may be considered the first-line treatment for isolated IAAs in younger and mild-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms
    Fossaceca, R.
    Guzzardi, G.
    Di Terlizzi, M.
    Divenuto, I.
    Cerini, P.
    Malatesta, E.
    Di Gesu, I.
    Stanca, C.
    Brustia, P.
    Carriero, A.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (01): : 62 - 73
  • [32] Perioperative and Late Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms
    Massoni, Claudio Bianchini
    Freyrie, Antonio
    Gargiulo, Mauro
    Tecchio, Tiziano
    Mascoli, Chiara
    Gallitto, Enrico
    Faggioli, Gianluca
    Pini, Rodolfo
    Azzarone, Matteo
    Perini, Paolo
    Stella, Andrea
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 44 : 83 - 93
  • [33] Midterm results of endovascular versus open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in low surgical risk patients
    Arenas Azofra, Ernesto
    Iglesias Iglesias, Cristobal
    Canga Gonzalez, Carmen
    Alvarez Marcos, Francisco
    Prendes, Carlota Fernandez
    Zanabili Al Sibbai, Amer
    Alonso Perez, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06) : 1897 - 1903
  • [34] Open versus Endovascular Treatment of Visceral Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms
    Batagini, Nayara Cioffi
    El-Arousy, Hazem
    Clair, Daniel G.
    Kirksey, Lee
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 35 : 1 - 8
  • [35] Long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms
    Fossaceca, R.
    Guzzardi, G.
    Di Terlizzi, M.
    Divenuto, I.
    Cerini, P.
    Malatesta, E.
    Di Gesu, I.
    Stanca, C.
    Brustia, P.
    Carriero, A.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (01): : 62 - 73
  • [36] Endovascular chimney technique versus open repair of juxtarenal and suprarenal aneurysms
    Bruen, Kevin J.
    Feezor, Robert J.
    Daniels, Michael J.
    Beck, Adam W.
    Lee, W. Anthony
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (04) : 895 - 905
  • [37] Quality of Life After Open Surgical versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Akbulut, Mustafa
    Aksoy, Eray
    Kara, Ibrahim
    Cekmecelioglu, Davut
    Koksal, Cengiz
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 33 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [38] Open Versus Fenestrated Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    O'Donnell, Thomas F. X.
    Boitano, Laura T.
    Deery, Sarah E.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Schanzer, Andres
    Beck, Adam W.
    Green, Richard M.
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Patel, Virendra, I
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (05) : 969 - 977
  • [39] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair of Acute Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Based on Worldwide Experience
    Hayes, Paul D.
    Sadat, Umar
    Walsh, Stewart R.
    Noorani, Ayesha
    Tang, Tjun Y.
    Bowden, David J.
    Gillard, Jonathan H.
    Boyle, Jonathan R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 17 (02) : 174 - 182
  • [40] Isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Interventional treatment
    Pfammatter, T.
    Kobe, A.
    Lachat, M. L.
    RADIOLOGE, 2018, 58 (09): : 837 - 840