Biomass and coal cofiring gasification with pre-combustion carbon capture: Impact of mixed feedstocks on CO2 absorption using a physical solvent

被引:0
作者
Smith, Kathryn H. [1 ,3 ]
Stanislowski, Joshua J. [2 ]
Swanson, Michael L. [2 ]
Siefert, Nicholas S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
[2] Univ North Dakota, Energy & Environm Res Ctr, Grand Forks, ND USA
[3] Carbon Capture Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Biomass; Coal; Gasification; Pre-combustion CO 2 capture; Hydrogen; Physical solvent;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104300
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Advances in co-gasification of coal and biomass are resulting in more interest in poly-generation facilities that can produce hydrogen rich syngas for producing chemicals, fuels and energy, with much lower carbon emissions. When biomass is blended with hydrocarbon feedstocks like coal (biomass cofiring) and when the carbon dioxide (CO2) produced during the gasification process is captured using pre-combustion CO2 capture technologies, it is possible to emit less CO2 into the atmosphere than it took to grow the biomass material, resulting in net negative or low CO2 emissions. Here, we present the first carbon capture pilot plant data for CO2 removal from coal and biomass derived syngas using physical solvent absorption. The physical solvent (DEPG at 35.0 L center dot h-1 and 10.5 degrees C) was tested in a packed absorption column under pre-combustion CO2 capture conditions using the biomass derived syngas mixtures (3.54 MPa at 3.4 std. m3 center dot h-1 and 53.1 degrees C) to assess any changes in the absorption process resulting from co-gasification. Overall, the CO2 absorption performance of the solvent did not appear to be impacted by the varying feedstock compositions as indicated by average CO2 removal efficiency of 97.3 % with a standard deviation of 1.6 % across all trials. Despite minor accumulation of organic gas species in the solvent and gas streams exiting the absorber, there did not appear to be any strong correlations between CO2 capture performance and coal type or biomass type or mixture concentration. These results indicate traditional physical solvent absorption processes can be used with minimal impact from novel gasification feedstock mixtures including coal, wood and corn stover mixtures, but longer term testing is recommended to fully assess the impact of accumulating inorganic and organic species from biomass feedstock.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, U.S. National Clean Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap
  • [2] Levelized Cost of CO2 Captured Using Five Physical Solvents in Pre-combustion Applications
    Ashkanani, Husain E.
    Wang, Rui
    Shi, Wei
    Siefert, Nicholas S.
    Thompson, Robert L.
    Smith, Kathryn
    Steckel, Janice A.
    Gamwo, Isaac K.
    Hopkinson, David
    Resnik, Kevin
    Morsi, Badie, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2020, 101
  • [3] Burr B., 2008, A Comparison of Physical Solvents For Acid Gas removal, Digital Refining
  • [4] Carpenter SM, 2017, WOODHEAD PUBL SER EN, P445, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100167-7.00036-6
  • [5] Clariant International Ltd, 2017, Catalysts and Adsorbents for Syngas
  • [6] Techno-economic assessment of combined hydrogen & power co-generation with carbon capture: The case of coal gasification
    Cormos, Ana-Maria
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 147 : 29 - 39
  • [7] Folger P., 2013, Carbon Capture: A Technology Assessment
  • [8] Conceptual design of membrane-based pre-combustion CO2 capture process: Role of permeance and selectivity on performance and costs
    Giordano, Lorena
    Gubis, Jan
    Bierman, Giljam
    Kapteijn, Freek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2019, 575 : 229 - 241
  • [9] Ho W., 2019, 2019 NETL CARB CAPT
  • [10] Co-gasification of coal and biomass an emerging clean energy technology: Status and prospects of development in Indian context
    Kamble, Alka D.
    Saxena, Vinod Kumar
    Chavan, Prakash Dhondiram
    Mendhe, Vinod Atmaram
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 29 (02) : 171 - 186