Human factors and patient safety in undergraduate healthcare education: A systematic review

被引:6
作者
Sheehan, Patricia [1 ]
Joy, Aislinn [3 ]
Fleming, Aoife [1 ]
Vosper, Helen [2 ]
McCarthy, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Pharm, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Med, Med Educ Unit, Cork, Ireland
来源
HUMAN FACTORS IN HEALTHCARE | 2022年 / 2卷
关键词
Human factors; Ergonomics; Patient safety; Healthcare education; SEIPS; 101; NURSING-STUDENTS; PERCEPTIONS; KNOWLEDGE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100019
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030 presents Human Factors (HF) capacity development as a core strategic objective. HF has been identified as a suitable framework for delivery of patient safety education. Findings of a previous review identified a lack of formally articulated patient safety curricula with Human Factors and Ergonomics largely absent. Objective: to capture the extent to which HF is currently reported in the context of undergraduate healthcare curricula, and to characterise how it is reported using SEIPS 101. Methods: Using a publication timeframe from 2016-2021 A systematic search was conducted using the following databases: Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, CINAHL and Eric. Relevant websites were searched for grey literature. The PETT (People, Environments, Tools and Tasks) component of SEIPS 101 was chosen as framework for data extraction and analysis. Results: 25 papers were included in the review. In comparison with a previous review, findings demonstrate increased reporting of HF in the context of undergraduate healthcare curricula. SEIPS 101 helped identify both barriers and opportunities relating to HF implementation under the headings of people, environment, tools and tasks. Barriers included lack of shared safety language, lack of faculty expertise in patient safety (PS) as well as the lack of appropriate HF based competency framework to guide curriculum development. Opportunities included increased organisational collaboration between academic and clinical settings with respect to PS teaching. Educational accreditation bodies, and the professional regulators who influence them, were identified as important drivers of curricular change.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Allen C., 2018, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, V19, P94, DOI [10.1177/1751143718772957, DOI 10.1177/1751143718772957]
[2]   A multi-university assessment of patient safety competence during clinical training among baccalaureate nursing students: A cross-sectional study [J].
Alquwez, Nahed ;
Cruz, Jonas Preposi ;
Alshammari, Farhan ;
Felemban, Ebaa Marwan ;
Almazan, Joseph U. ;
Tumala, Regie B. ;
Alabdulaziz, Hawa M. ;
Alsolami, Fatmah ;
Silang, John Paul Ben T. ;
Tork, Hanan M. M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (9-10) :1771-1781
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: Towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Textbook of patient safety and clinical risk management, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The WHO Patient Safety Curriculum Guide
[6]   Escape into patient safety: bringing human factors to life for medical students [J].
Backhouse, Adam ;
Malik, Myra .
BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2019, 8 (01)
[7]  
Bahadur S., 2018, Medical Forum Monthly, V29, P59
[8]   Patient Safety Morning Report: Innovation in Teaching Core Patient Safety Principles to Third-Year Medical Students [J].
Beekman, Michele ;
Emani, Vamsi K. ;
Wolford, Robert ;
Hanson, Keith ;
Wickham, Gerald ;
Aiyer, Meenakshy .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 6
[9]  
Bohomol Elena, 2019, Esc. Anna Nery, V23, pe20180364
[10]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]