Exploring Differences in the Lateralized Readiness Potential in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Compared to Healthy Controls

被引:0
作者
Martell, Shelby G. [1 ]
Keye, Shelby A. [2 ]
Kim, Jeongwoon [2 ]
Walk, Anne [3 ]
Erdman Jr, John W. [4 ,5 ]
Adamson, Brynn [6 ]
Motl, Robert W. [7 ]
Khan, Naiman A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Neurosci Program, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Kinesiol & Community Hlth, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Eastern Illinois Univ, Dept Psychol, Charleston, IL USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Div Nutr Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Div Nutr Sci, Urbana, IL USA
[6] Univ Colorado Colorado Springs, Dept Hlth Sci, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[7] Univ Illinois, Dept Kinesiol & Nutr, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
event-related; initiation; lateralized; motor; multiple sclerosis; response; INFORMATION-PROCESSING SPEED; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; SCHIZOPHRENIA EVIDENCE; RESPONSE SPEED; REACTION-TIME; ACTIVATION; AMPLITUDE; SELECTION; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.70022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease often leading to cognitive and motor impairment. Little research has examined motor preparation and initiation outcomes in the brain among persons with MS. The lateralized readiness potential is an ERP component that indexes pre-motor activity evaluating the stimulus (LRP-S) and motor activation for the response (LRP-R). We examined the LRP-S and LRP-R in MS and healthy controls (HC) to understand impairments in neural activity associated with response activation and selection. Persons with MS (n = 53) and HC (n = 53) completed a flanker task with concurrent EEG for LRP extraction. Paired t-tests were conducted to determine differences for accuracy, reaction time (RT), LRP-S, and LRP-R. Within-group Pearson correlations were conducted to investigate the relationship between LRP indices and behavioral performance. Participants with MS had delayed LRP-S latency and reduced LRP-R amplitudes compared to HC for both trial types. In the HC group, LRP-S amplitude and latency were positively related to RT. In the MS group, LRP-S latency was positively related to RT. In both MS and HC, incongruent LRP-R latency was negatively related to RT, suggesting that individuals with a shorter time interval between activation and response had faster reaction times. Persons with MS had delayed response selection, and less neural response activation compared to HC. Impairment in MS is evident for both pre-motor and motor response initiation during a selective attention task. Our study also provided evidence the relationship between action-based components and task performance differ in persons with MS and HC.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Bardel B., Chalah M.A., Creange A., Lefaucheur J.P., Ayache S.S., Motor Preparation Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence From the Bereitschaftspotential in Simple and Complex Motor Tasks, Neurophysiologie Clinique, 52, 2, pp. 137-146, (2022)
[2]  
Benedict R.H.B., Holtzer R., Motl R.W., Et al., Upper and Lower Extremity Motor Function and Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 4, pp. 643-653, (2011)
[3]  
Binetruy M., Chopard G., Laurent E., Et al., Slowing of Information Processing Speed Without Motor Slowing in Multiple Sclerosis Observed During Two Crossing-Off Tasks, Revue Neurologique, 172, 3, pp. 225-230, (2016)
[4]  
Cerna J., Edwards C.G., Martell S., Et al., Neuroprotective Influence of Macular Xanthophylls and Retinal Integrity on Cognitive Function Among Persons With Multiple Sclerosis, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 188, pp. 24-32, (2023)
[5]  
Cespon J., Galdo-Alvarez S., Diaz F., Electrophysiological Correlates of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Simon Task, PLoS One, 8, 12, (2013)
[6]  
Chiaravalloti N.D., DeLuca J., Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis, Lancet Neurology, 7, 12, pp. 1139-1151, (2008)
[7]  
Cid-Fernandez S., Lindin M., Diaz F., Stimulus-Locked Lateralized Readiness Potential and Performance: Useful Markers for Differentiating Between Amnestic Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, 4, 1, pp. 21-28, (2017)
[8]  
Coles M.G., Modern Mind-Brain Reading: Psychophysiology, Physiology, and Cognition, Psychophysiology, 26, 3, pp. 251-269, (1989)
[9]  
Costa S.L., Genova H.M., DeLuca J., Chiaravalloti N.D., Information Processing Speed in Multiple Sclerosis: Past, Present, and Future, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 23, 6, pp. 772-789, (2016)
[10]  
Covey T.J., Shucard J.L., Shucard D.W., Evaluation of Cognitive Control and Distraction Using Event-Related Potentials in Healthy Individuals and Patients With Multiple Sclerosis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9743, pp. 165-176, (2016)