Understanding local government responsible AI strategy: An international municipal policy document analysis

被引:1
作者
David, Anne [1 ]
Yigitcanlar, Tan [1 ]
Desouza, Kevin [2 ]
Li, Rita Yi Man [3 ]
Cheong, Pauline Hope [4 ]
Mehmood, Rashid [5 ]
Corchado, Juan [6 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Management, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[3] Hong Kong Shue Yan Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, 10 Wai Tsui Cres,North Point, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Arizona State Univ, Hugh Downs Sch Human Commun, Phoenix, AZ 85287 USA
[5] Islamic Univ Madinah, Fac Comp & Informat Syst, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
[6] Univ Salamanca, Dept Comp Sci & Automat, Salamanca 37007, Spain
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Responsible innovation and technology; Responsible AI; AI policy; AI strategy; Local government; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2024.105502
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The burgeoning capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) have prompted numerous local governments worldwide to consider its integration into their operations. Nevertheless, instances of notable AI failures have heightened ethical concerns, emphasising the imperative for local governments to approach the adoption of AI technologies in a responsible manner. While local government AI guidelines endeavour to incorporate characteristics of responsible innovation and technology (RIT), it remains essential to assess the extent to which these characteristics have been integrated into policy guidelines to facilitate more effective AI governance in the future. This study closely examines local government policy documents (n = 26) through the lens of RIT, employing directed content analysis with thematic data analysis software. The results reveal that: (a) Not all RIT characteristics have been given equal consideration in these policy documents; (b) Participatory and deliberate considerations were the most frequently mentioned responsible AI characteristics in policy documents; (c) Adaptable, explainable, sustainable, and accountable considerations were the least present responsible AI characteristics in policy documents; (d) Many of the considerations overlapped with each other as local governments were at the early stages of identifying them. Furthermore, the paper summarised strategies aimed at assisting local authorities in identifying their strengths and weaknesses in responsible AI characteristics, thereby facilitating their transformation into governing entities with responsible AI practices. The study informs local government policymakers, practitioners, and researchers on the critical aspects of responsible AI policymaking.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 117 条
  • [1] Risk Messages About HPV, Cervical Cancer, and the HPV Vaccine Gardasil: A Content Analysis of Canadian and US National Newspaper Articles
    Abdelmutti, Nazek
    Hoffman-Goetz, Laurie
    [J]. WOMEN & HEALTH, 2009, 49 (05) : 422 - 440
  • [2] AlShebli B., 2023, ARXIV
  • [3] Amsterdam City, 2020, AGENDA AI AMSTERDAM
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Openness, DOI [10.1787/ac8ed8e8-en, DOI 10.1787/AC8ED8E8-EN]
  • [5] The policy diffusion of environmental performance in the European countries
    Arbolino, Roberta
    Carlucci, Fabio
    De Simone, Luisa
    Ioppolo, Giuseppe
    Yigitcanlar, Tan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 89 : 130 - 138
  • [6] FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier's declarations of conformity
    Arnold, M.
    Bellamy, R. K. E.
    Hind, M.
    Houde, S.
    Mehta, S.
    Mojsilovic, A.
    Nair, R.
    Ramamurthy, K. Natesan
    Olteanu, A.
    Piorkowski, D.
    Reimer, D.
    Richards, J.
    Tsay, J.
    Varshney, K. R.
    [J]. IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 63 (4-5)
  • [7] Toward Artificial Argumentation
    Atkinson, Katie
    Baroni, Pietro
    Giacomin, Massimiliano
    Hunter, Anthony
    Prakken, Henry
    Reed, Chris
    Simari, Guillermo
    Thimm, Matthias
    Villata, Serena
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 2017, 38 (03) : 25 - 36
  • [8] Barcelona City Council, 2021, GOVT MEASURE MUNICIP
  • [9] Can we trust AI? An empirical investigation of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption
    Bedue, Patrick
    Fritzsche, Albrecht
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 35 (02) : 530 - 549
  • [10] Benton J.E., 2013, State and Local Government Review, V45, P220, DOI [10.1177/0160323x13515683, DOI 10.1177/0160323X13515683]