A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Wood-Aluminum Window Production in Two Life Cycle Assessment Software

被引:0
作者
Seckar, Michal [1 ]
Schwarz, Marian [1 ]
Pochyba, Adam [1 ]
Polgar, Andras [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Zvolen, Fac Ecol & Environm Sci, Dept Environm Engn, T G Masaryka 24, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
[2] Univ Sopron, Inst Environm Protect & Nat Conservat, Fac Forestry, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky u 4, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary
关键词
life cycle assessment; window; SimaPro; GaBi; software tools; environmental impacts;
D O I
10.3390/su16219581
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the construction sector, there is a shift towards environmentally conscious practices that prioritize the minimization of environmental burdens. In this study, we dealt with a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of a wood-aluminum window in two software tools. SimaPro (PR & eacute; Sustainability) and Sphera LCA for Experts (formerly known as GaBi) were selected. The results from both software tools were compared to assess the output uniformity of the two selected tools. The results indicate the similarities and differences in the software tools. The most similar results were achieved for impact categories Photochemical Ozone Formation (1.1% difference), Human Toxicity, cancer (total) (3.6% difference), Climate Change (3.7% difference) and for Resource Use, fossils (4.5% difference), respectively. On the other hand, the results were most different in the impact categories Ozone Depletion (84.7% difference), Resource Use, minerals and metals (75% difference), Ecotoxicity, freshwater-inorganics (35.6%) and Ecotoxicity, freshwater (total) (31.2%), respectively. The differences in the LCA results between SimaPro and GaBi were analyzed in-depth and were mainly attributable to using different databases in the transportation process and due to different system boundaries in some processes, with the Ecoinvent data containing significantly more background processes and inconsistencies in the implemented characterization factors.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Abo Einan O., 2015, PORT SAID ENG RES J, V19, P21, DOI [10.21608/pserj.2015.36730, DOI 10.21608/PSERJ.2015.36730]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2023, STN EN 17610 (166010)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/1700 of 15 September 2021 on Internal Compliance Programmesfor Controls of Research Involving Dual -Use Items under Regulation (EU) 2021/ 821 of the European Parliament and of the Council Setting Up a Union Regime for the Control of Exports, Brokering, Technical Assistance, Transit and Transfer of dual -use items
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, STN 166011 (166011)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, RAL-GZ 607/3
  • [6] Case Study: LCA Methodology Applied to Materials Management in a Brazilian Residential Construction Site
    de Lassio, Joao
    Franca, Josue
    Santo, Karida Espirito
    Haddad, Assed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
  • [7] A Life Cycle Assessment of Two Residential Buildings Using Two Different LCA Database-Software Combinations: Recognizing Uniformities and Inconsistencies
    Emami, Nargessadat
    Heinonen, Jukka
    Marteinsson, Bjorn
    Saynajoki, Antti
    Junnonen, Juha-Matti
    Laine, Jani
    Junnila, Seppo
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2019, 9 (01)
  • [8] Ghanbari M., 2023, J. Arch. Environ. Struct. Eng. Res, V6, P11, DOI [10.30564/jaeser.v6i4.5964, DOI 10.30564/JAESER.V6I4.5964]
  • [9] Hauschild M., 2017, Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3, 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3]
  • [10] Does it matter which Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool you choose? - a comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi
    Herrmann, Ivan T.
    Moltesen, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 86 : 163 - 169