How external factors influence organisational digital innovation: Evidence from China

被引:3
作者
Xia, Yue [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Johar, Md Gapar Md [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, Sch Econ & Social Welf, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Management & Sci Univ, Post Grad Ctr, Shah Alam, Malaysia
[3] Management & Sci Univ, Software Engn & Digital Innovat Ctr, Shah Alam, Malaysia
[4] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, 8 Shuren St, Hangzhou 310015, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Organisational digital innovation; Digital innovation ecosystem; Data flows; Digital infrastructure; Regulatory environment; ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; PERSPECTIVE; INFRASTRUCTURES; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; PRODUCT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102802
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Although the digital economy has developed remarkably in recent years, the - motivation for organisational digital innovation is still lacking, and the existing data market size is far below its real value. Most previous studies proposed factors influencing digital innovation mainly from an organisational perspective, and the impact of external environmental factors has been ignored to a certain extent. To explore the impact of external factors such as digital infrastructure and the regulatory environment, this study surveyed a sample of 346 enterprises in China operating in both the core industries of digital economy and traditional industries and analysed using SPSS and AMOS. The findings reveal that digital infrastructure and the regulatory environment positively and significantly a digital innovation. The flow of data elements within a digital innovation ecosystem mediates the relationship between external factors and organisational digital innovation. Our findings enrich the theory of digital innovation ecosystems and provide a reference for enterprises to seize external resources, and for policymakers to focus on policies and regulations that facilitate the flow of data.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [11] Buhe C., 2022, Forum on Science and Technology in China, P54, DOI [10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2022.09.016, DOI 10.13580/J.CNKI.FSTC.2022.09.016]
  • [12] [蔡跃洲 Cai Yuezhou], 2021, [数量经济技术经济研究, Quantitative & Technical Economics], V38, P64
  • [13] CARRIERE-SWALLOW Yan., 2019, The economics and implications of data: an integrated perspective
  • [14] Managing Digital Transformation: Scope of Transformation and Modalities of Value Co-Generation and Delivery
    Cennamo, Carmelo
    Dagnino, Giovanni Battista
    Di Minin, Alberto
    Lanzolla, Gianvito
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 62 (04) : 5 - 16
  • [15] Early warning signals for war in the news
    Chadefaux, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2014, 51 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [16] A General framework for studying the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem: The case of big data
    Chae, Bongsug
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 : 83 - 94
  • [17] Chakravorti B., 2019, Ease of doing digital business 2019. Which Countries Help Expedite Entry, Growth, and Exit of Technology-Based Businesses
  • [18] Chatrchyan S, 2011, J HIGH ENERGY PHYS, DOI 10.1007/JHEP08(2011)005
  • [19] Chen X., 2022, Mana. World., V38, P13, DOI [10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2022.0020, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2022.0020]
  • [20] Assessing inter-organizational innovation performance through relational governance and dynamic capabilities in supply chains
    Cheng, Jao-Hong
    Chen, Mu-Chung
    Huang, Chung-Ming
    [J]. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2014, 19 (02) : 173 - 186