Co-Digestion of Dehydrated Sewage Sludge (DSS) and Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW): Analysis of the Process and Economic Evaluations

被引:1
作者
Limonti, Carlo [1 ]
Le Pera, Adolfo [2 ]
Sellaro, Miriam [2 ]
Grande, Giulia [2 ]
Curcio, Giulia Maria [1 ]
Andreoli, Tiziana [1 ]
Rivera, Elvis Gribaldo Aucancela
Siciliano, Alessio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calabria, Dept Environm Engn, Lab Sanitary & Environm Engn, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, CS, Italy
[2] Calabra Maceri & Servizi SpA, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, CS, Italy
来源
FERMENTATION-BASEL | 2024年 / 10卷 / 12期
关键词
anaerobic co-digestion; dehydrated sewage sludge; methane production; organic fraction of municipal solid waste; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; FOOD-WASTE; DISINTEGRATION; TECHNOLOGIES; CODIGESTION; BIOGAS;
D O I
10.3390/fermentation10120600
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of anaerobic digestion (AD) in the co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and municipal dehydrated sewage sludge (DSS). The experiments were conducted in batch and continuous mode under mesophilic conditions (T = 37 +/- 2 degrees C). The results of batch tests indicated that the use of DSS in co-digestion with OFMSW led to a biomethane production of 422 NmLCH4/gVS with a production yield of 450 NmLCH4/gVSremoved. Nevertheless, the findings of the tests conducted with OFMSW alone demonstrated superior performance. A pilot plant reactor with a volume of approximately 2 m3 was employed in the continuous tests. The results corroborated the trends observed in the batch tests. In particular, the specific methane production yields decreased from 0.47 Nm3/kgVS when OFMSW was the sole substrate to 0.44 Nm3/kgVS when DSS was introduced, with a DSS/OFMSW ratio (RDO) of 0.1. Despite the reduction in methane production yield observed in both batch and continuous tests, a techno-economic assessment of the process indicated the potential profitability of DSS in co-digestion with OFMSW. Notably, the estimated profit from utilizing DSS in a percentage of 10% (RDO = 0.1) is 108 EUR/ton, compared to 102 EUR/ton when only OFMSW is employed.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil
[2]  
[Anonymous], Sewage Sludge Production and Disposal from Urban Wastewater
[3]  
APHA, 1999, Standard Methods for the Examination of the Water and Wastewater
[4]   Energy feasibility and life cycle assessment of sludge pretreatment methods for advanced anaerobic digestion [J].
Balasundaram, Gowtham ;
Vidyarthi, Praveen Kumar ;
Gahlot, Pallavi ;
Arora, Pratham ;
Kumar, Vinod ;
Kumar, Manish ;
Kazmi, A. A. ;
Tyagi, Vinay Kumar .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 357
[5]   From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context [J].
Barbera, Elena ;
Menegon, Silvia ;
Banzato, Donatella ;
D'Alpaos, Chiara ;
Bertucco, Alberto .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 135 :663-673
[6]   Anaerobic codigestion of waste activated sludge and OFMSW: the experiences of Viareggio and Treviso plants (Italy) [J].
Bolzonella, D. ;
Battistoni, P. ;
Susini, C. ;
Cecchi, F. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (08) :203-211
[7]   Critical review for microwave pretreatment of waste-activated sludge prior to anaerobic digestion [J].
Bozkurt, Yigit C. ;
Apul, Onur G. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH, 2020, 14 :1-9
[8]   Pilot plant experience on anaerobic codigestion of source selected OFMSW and sewage sludge [J].
Cabbai, Valentina ;
De Bortoli, Nicola ;
Goi, Daniele .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 49 :47-54
[9]  
Cave Cadastre,, 2022, Cave Register of the Karst Research Institute ZRC SAZU and Speleological Association of Slovenia
[10]   Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and source sorted biowaste in pilot- and full-scale reactors [J].
Cavinato, Cristina ;
Bolzonella, David ;
Pavan, Paolo ;
Fatone, Francesco ;
Cecchi, Franco .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 55 :260-265