Assessment of breast composition in MRI using artificial intelligence e A systematic review

被引:0
作者
Murphy, P. C. [1 ,3 ]
Mcentee, M. [3 ]
Maher, M. [1 ,2 ]
Ryan, M. F. [1 ,2 ]
Harman, C. [4 ]
England, A. [3 ]
Moore, N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cork Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Cork, Coll Med & Hlth, Dept Radiol, Cork, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Discipline Med Imaging & Radiat Therapy, Cork, Ireland
[4] Cork Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Therapy, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Breast; MRI; Breast composition;
D O I
10.1016/j.radi.2025.102900
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) performs a critical role in breast cancer diagnosis, especially for high-risk populations e.g. family history. MRI could take advantage of the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI). AI assessment of breast composition factors is less studied than those of lesion detection and classification. These factors are breast density, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and fibroglandular tissue (FGT), which are recognized breast cancer phenotypes. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, the PROSPERO registered review examined the role of AI in assessing breast composition in MRI. A search of articles from Pubmed, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google scholar from 2010 to 2022 was conducted. Peer-reviewed, in-vivo studies were included based on defined search categories. Adapted QUADAS-2, CASP and Covidence tools were utilized for quality assessment. Results: Seven studies were identified as being of sufficiently high quality. The studies showed that AI has the potential to provide a comparable level of accuracy against the relevant reference standard. There were limited performance results when delineating BPE and FGT BI-RADs categories. The review highlighted the variability in AI models while the range of statistical methods and small cohort sizes limited cross study compatibility. Conclusions: AI has potential in assessing breast composition in MRI. However, variability in AI systems deployed and statistical measurements alongside limited validation across diverse populations remain an issue. AI systems may perform better with binary categorizations rather than the quaternary spectrum of BI-RADS. Implications for practice: AI could assist in developing personalized breast composition assessments. Future developments could focus on better delineation of breast composition categories. AI models that have trained on more diverse and larger populations should result in more robust and effective clinical applications. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COVIDENCE SYSTEMATIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEMA PS3/ISO 12052
[3]   Predictive Value of Breast MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement for Neoadjuvant Treatment Response among HER2-Patients [J].
Arasu, Vignesh A. ;
Kim, Paul ;
Li, Wen ;
Strand, Fredrik ;
McHargue, Cody ;
Harnish, Roy ;
Newitt, David C. ;
Jones, Ella F. ;
Glymour, M. Maria ;
Kornak, John ;
Esserman, Laura J. ;
Hylton, Nola M. .
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2020, 2 (04) :352-360
[4]   Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040 [J].
Arnold, Melina ;
Morgan, Eileen ;
Rumgay, Harriet ;
Mafra, Allini ;
Singh, Deependra ;
Laversanne, Mathieu ;
Vignat, Jerome ;
Gralow, Julie R. ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Siesling, Sabine ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle .
BREAST, 2022, 66 :15-23
[5]   Updates in Artificial Intelligence for Breast Imaging [J].
Bahl, Manisha .
SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 57 (02) :160-167
[6]  
Bhandari Abhiyan, 2024, Cureus, V16, pe72646, DOI [10.7759/cureus.72646, 10.7759/cureus.72646]
[7]   Fully automatic classification of breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement using a transfer learning approach [J].
Borkowski, Karol ;
Rossi, Cristina ;
Ciritsis, Alexander ;
Marcon, Magda ;
Hejduk, Patryk ;
Stieb, Sonja ;
Boss, Andreas ;
Berger, Nicole .
MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (29)
[8]   Developing, purchasing, implementing and monitoring AI tools in radiology: practical considerations. A multi-society statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA [J].
Brady, Adrian P. ;
Allen, Bibb ;
Chong, Jaron ;
Kotter, Elmar ;
Kottler, Nina ;
Mongan, John ;
Oakden-Rayner, Lauren ;
dos Santos, Daniel Pinto ;
Tang, An ;
Wald, Christoph ;
Slavotinek, John .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01)
[9]   Comparison of the sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and combinations of these imaging modalities for the detection of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer [J].
Chen, Hai-long ;
Zhou, Jiao-qun ;
Chen, Qiang ;
Deng, Yong-chuan .
MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (26) :E26531
[10]   The current status of risk-stratified breast screening [J].
Clift, Ash Kieran ;
Dodwell, David ;
Lord, Simon ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Brady, Sir Michael ;
Collins, Gary S. ;
Hippisley-Cox, Julia .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 126 (04) :533-550