EFFECTS OF FISCAL RULES AND POLITICAL FRAMEWORK: EVIDENCE FROM COVID-19 CRISIS

被引:0
作者
Kilic, Erdem [1 ]
Sonmezer, Sitki [2 ]
Ozaydin, Orhan [3 ]
机构
[1] Doc Dr Beykoz Univ, Isletme & Yonetim Bilimleri Fak, Isletme Bolumu Ingilizce, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Doc Dr Istanbul Ticaret Univ, Ticari Bilimler Fak, Bankacilik & Finans Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Nisantasi Univ, Iktisadi Idari & Sosyal Bilimler Fak, Finans & Bankacilik Bolumu, Bolumu, Turkiye
来源
EKONOMI POLITIKA & FINANS ARASTIRMALARI DERGISI | 2022年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
Fiscal Rule; Fiscal Policy; COVID-19; PUBLIC DEBT; POLICY;
D O I
10.30784/epfad.1206600
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The COVID-19-Crisis impacted economic growth globally, opening up the need for public spending. These conditions put national fiscal authorities under pressure, challenging them primarily to remedy the economic downturn, and secondly to balance fiscal resources. We analyze whether alternative institutional frameworks, fiscal rules and political regimes across numerous countries can explain different economic outcomes following the COVID-19-Crisis. The empirical results show that growth in GDP affects gross debt negatively, government revenue positively, and national savings positively for all subsets, except for the federal subset. The effect on government revenue for fiscal subset is higher than for no fiscal rule. In almost all the subgroup models, it can be observed that the COVID-19 period has a positive effect on gross government debt and a negative on government revenue, except for federal countries and countries with a fiscal rule and a majority government. For all subsets the effect of the COVID-19 variable is not significant in the national savings regression models. For the countries in the federal subset the explanatory variables are unable to reduce the government debt. Conclusively, we could propose adaptive fiscal rules, which motivate fiscal authorities to maintain fiscal balance in long debt and in the annual budget.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 888
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Historical Patterns and Dynamics of Public Debt-Evidence From a New Database [J].
Abbas, S. M. Ali ;
Belhocine, Nazim ;
El-Ganainy, Asmaa ;
Horton, Mark .
IMF ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 59 (04) :717-742
[2]   Using inflation to erode the US public debt [J].
Aizenman, Joshua ;
Marion, Nancy .
JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (04) :524-541
[3]   Fiscal policy and current account in an oil-rich economy: the case of Nigeria [J].
Akanbi, Olusegun Ayodele .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 48 (04) :1563-1585
[4]  
Alesina A., 1999, NBER Working Paper 5556
[5]   Twin deficit hypothesis and reverse causality: a case study of China [J].
Banday, Umer Jeelanie ;
Aneja, Ranjan .
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 5 (1)
[6]  
Barkema J., 2020, SSRN Working Paper No. 3758093
[7]   THE RICARDIAN APPROACH TO BUDGET DEFICITS [J].
BARRO, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1989, 3 (02) :37-54
[8]   DETERMINATION OF THE PUBLIC DEBT [J].
BARRO, RJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1979, 87 (05) :940-971
[9]  
Beetsma Roel, 2022, Inter Econ, V57, P11, DOI 10.1007/s10272-022-1021-1
[10]   Redesigning EU fiscal rules: from rules to standards [J].
Blanchard, Olivier ;
Leandro, Alvaro ;
Zettelmeyer, Jeromin .
ECONOMIC POLICY, 2021, 36 (106) :195-236