Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Sugar, and Fiber Intake in Association With Breast Cancer Risk: An Updated Meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Pomares-Millan, Hugo [1 ]
Saxby, Solange M. [2 ]
Dahl, Sham Al-Mashadi [3 ]
Karagas, Margaret R. [1 ]
Passarelli, Michael N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol, One Med Ctr Dr Williamson Translat Res Bldg, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hlth, Geisel Sch Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Aarhus, Denmark
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
carbohydrates; glycemic index; glycemic load; dietary sugar; dietary fiber; breast cancer; meta-analysis; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR STATUS; DOSE-RESPONSE METAANALYSIS; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; CONSUMPTION; HEALTH; WOMEN; NUTRITION; ADULTHOOD; ESTROGEN;
D O I
10.1093/nutrit/nuaf038
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Context Several prospective cohort studies have investigated the association between glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), dietary sugar, and total dietary fiber intake, with female breast cancer (BC) risk and reported inconsistent results. In the last decade, several large epidemiological studies have investigated these associations, suggesting the need to revisit the current body of evidence.Objective The aim of this study was to update a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Schlesinger et al in 2017 using recent scientific evidence published since 2015.Data Sources Publications indexed in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were retrieved from the inception of the database up to January 2024.Data Extraction Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed each study's quality.Data Analysis A random-effects model was used to estimate summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for a meta-analysis that included 33 publications, with 26 prospective cohort studies cumulatively enrolling 2 212 645 women, among whom 79 777 were diagnosed with incident BC.Results Dietary GI and GL (highest vs lowest exposure intake) were both associated with 5% higher BC risk-RR (95% CI): 1.05 (1.01-1.09; P = .007) and 1.05 (0.97-1.13; P = .24), respectively. No clear associations were observed for sugar and total dietary fiber intake (highest vs lowest exposure intake)-RR (95% CI): 1.12 (0.95-1.11; P = .16) and 0.93 (0.86-1.00; P = .05), respectively. For the latter, the association was more pronounced among premenopausal women (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68-0.90; P = .0008).Conclusion This meta-analysis supports a significant positive association between high dietary GI intake and higher risk of BC and a significant inverse association between high dietary fiber intake and lower risk of BC. Interventions promoting a high-fiber and low-sugar diet may be useful components of BC-prevention strategies.Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023463143.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1182
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Dietary Carbohydrate, Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Breast Cancer Risk Among Mexican Women [J].
Amadou, Amina ;
Degoul, Julie ;
Hainaut, Pierre ;
Chajes, Veronique ;
Biessy, Carine ;
Torres Mejia, Gabriela ;
Huybrechts, Inge ;
Moreno Macia, Hortensia ;
Ortega, Caro ;
Angeles-Llerenas, Anjelica ;
Romieu, Isabelle .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) :917-924
[2]  
[Anonymous], The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
[3]   Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: An International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC) [J].
Augustin, L. S. A. ;
Kendall, C. W. C. ;
Jenkins, D. J. A. ;
Willett, W. C. ;
Astrup, A. ;
Barclay, A. W. ;
Bjorck, I. ;
Brand-Miller, J. C. ;
Brighenti, F. ;
Buyken, A. E. ;
Ceriello, A. ;
La Vecchia, C. ;
Livesey, G. ;
Liu, S. ;
Riccardi, G. ;
Rizkalla, S. W. ;
Sievenpiper, J. L. ;
Trichopoulou, A. ;
Wolever, T. M. S. ;
Baer-Sinnott, S. ;
Poli, A. .
NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2015, 25 (09) :795-815
[4]   Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: A case-control study [J].
Augustin, LSA ;
Dal Maso, L ;
Vecchia, CL ;
Parpinel, M ;
Negri, E ;
Vaccarella, S ;
Kendall, CWC ;
Jenkins, DJA ;
Franceschi, S .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (11) :1533-1538
[5]   Fruits, vegetables and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies [J].
Aune, D. ;
Chan, D. S. M. ;
Vieira, A. R. ;
Rosenblatt, D. A. Navarro ;
Vieira, R. ;
Greenwood, D. C. ;
Norat, T. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 134 (02) :479-493
[6]  
Chandler J., 2017, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.2.0
[7]   Intake of Energy-Dense Foods, Fast Foods, Sugary Drinks, and Breast Cancer Risk in African American and European American Women [J].
Chandran, Urmila ;
McCann, Susan E. ;
Zirpoli, Gary ;
Gong, Zhihong ;
Lin, Yong ;
Hong, Chi-Chen ;
Ciupak, Gregory ;
Pawlish, Karen ;
Ambrosone, Christine B. ;
Bandera, Elisa V. .
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2014, 66 (07) :1187-1199
[8]   Sugary drink consumption and risk of cancer: results from NutriNet-Sante prospective cohort [J].
Chazelas, Eloi ;
Srour, Bernard ;
Desmetz, Elisa ;
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle ;
Julia, Chantal ;
Deschamps, Valerie ;
Druesne-Pecollo, Nathalie ;
Galan, Pilar ;
Hercberg, Serge ;
Latino-Martel, Paule ;
Deschasaux, Melanie ;
Touvier, Mathilde .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 366
[9]   Effect of low glycaemic index or load dietary patterns on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J].
Chiavaroli, Laura ;
Lee, Danielle ;
Ahmed, Amna ;
Cheung, Annette ;
Khan, Tauseef A. ;
Mejia, Sonia Blanco ;
Mirrahimi, Arash ;
Jenkins, David J. A. ;
Livesey, Geoffrey ;
Wolever, Thomas M. S. ;
Rahelic, Dario ;
Kahleova, Hana ;
Salas-Salvado, Jordi ;
Kendall, Cyril W. C. ;
Sievenpiper, John L. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 374
[10]  
Cho E, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P1153