Personalized choice prediction with less user information

被引:0
作者
Chen, Francine [1 ]
Zhang, Yanxia [1 ]
Minh Nguyen [1 ,2 ]
Klenk, Matt [1 ]
Wu, Charlene [1 ]
机构
[1] Toyota Res Inst, Human Ctr AI, 4440 El Camino Real, Los Altos, CA 94022 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, ECE Dept, 2 W Loop Rd, New York, NY 10044 USA
关键词
Personalization; Missing data; Decision choice modeling; MODELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
While most models of human choice are linear to ease interpretation, it is not clear whether linear models are good models of human decision making. And while prior studies have investigated how task conditions and group characteristics, such as personality or socio-demographic background, influence human decisions, no prior works have investigated how to use less personal information for choice prediction. We propose a deep learning model based on self-attention and cross-attention to model human decision making which takes into account both subject-specific information and task conditions. We show that our model can consistently predict human decisions more accurately than linear models and other baseline models while remaining interpretable. In addition, although a larger amount of subject specific information will generally lead to more accurate choice prediction, collecting more surveys to gather subject background information is a burden to subjects, as well as costly and time-consuming. To address this, we introduce a training scheme that reduces the number of surveys that must be collected in order to achieve more accurate predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:1489 / 1509
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Scaling up psychology via Scientific Regret Minimization [J].
Agrawal, Mayank ;
Peterson, Joshua C. ;
Griffiths, Thomas L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (16) :8825-8835
[2]  
Arik SO, 2021, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, V35, P6679
[3]   Discrete Choice under Risk with Limited Consideration [J].
Barseghyan, Levon ;
Molinari, Francesca ;
Thirkettle, Matthew .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (06) :1972-2006
[4]   Measuring Prosociality: The Development of a Prosocial Behavioral Intentions Scale [J].
Baumsteiger, Rachel ;
Siegel, Jason T. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 101 (03) :305-314
[5]   The Relationship Between Economic Preferences and Psychological Personality Measures [J].
Becker, Anke ;
Deckers, Thomas ;
Dohmen, Thomas ;
Falk, Armin ;
Kosse, Fabian .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 :453-+
[6]   Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives [J].
Bengio, Yoshua ;
Courville, Aaron ;
Vincent, Pascal .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (08) :1798-1828
[7]  
Bourgin D. D., 2019, INT C MACH LEARN, P5133, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1905.09397
[8]  
Bower A, 2020, PR MACH LEARN RES, V119
[9]  
Chapelle O., 2005, Adv. Neural Inf. Process, V17, P257
[10]  
Chen T., 2015, XGBOOST EXTREME GRAD, V1, P1