Health Professionals' Approaches to Spirituality and Religiosity in Brazil: A Study Based on Item Response Theory

被引:0
作者
do Nascimento, Filipe Rodrigues Vargas [1 ]
de Goulart, Barbara Niegia Garcia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande Do Sul UFRGS, Grad Studies Epidemiol, Ramiro Barcelos 2600, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Spirituality; Religion and medicine; Comprehensive health care; Patient-centered care; Latent class analysis; CARE; PERSPECTIVE; DOCTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s10943-024-02208-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study aimed to estimate the proportion of Brazilian nurses, doctors, and psychologists who approach spirituality and religiosity (S/R) issues in professional practice. The study also explored these health professionals' willingness to interact with patients on issues related to S/R in their clinical practice using item response theory (IRT). From a nationwide cross-sectional web survey, demographic data and the opinions of doctors, nurses, and psychologists were collected regarding aspects related to S/R. For this study, the willingness of physicians to interact with patients regarding the S/R issues scale, developed by the Network for Research Spirituality and Health and translated into Brazilian Portuguese, was used. Information was adjusted according to the IRT. Of the 1095 participants, 335 (30.6%) were nurses, 433 (39.5%), doctors, and 327 (29.9%) were psychologists. The areas of activity with the most significant representation were primary healthcare (n = 292, 26.7%) and mental health (n = 296, 27.0%). A total of 76 (22.7%) nurses, 152 (35.1%) doctors, and 112 (34.3%) psychologists often or always asked about S/R in professional practice. There was a significant difference in the frequency of approach by nurses compared to doctors (p < 0.001) and psychologists (p = 0.001). Doctors were more willing to approach S/R, with a statistically significant difference between nurses (DM - 0.72, 95% CI BCa [- 1.38 to - 0.11]) and psychologists (DM 1.44, 95% CI BCa (0.76-2.11)]. This study should encourage a more comprehensive approach to human beings, contributing to more profound research in Brazil and worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Association of religiosity and spirituality with quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review [J].
Abu, Hawa O. ;
Ulbricht, Christine ;
Ding, Eric ;
Allison, Jeroan J. ;
Salmoirago-Blotcher, Elena ;
Goldberg, Robert J. ;
Kiefe, Catarina I. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (11) :2777-2797
[2]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[3]  
Arrosi KE., 2022, Psicologia Clnica, V34, P121, DOI [10.33208/PC1980-5438v0034n01A06, DOI 10.33208/PC1980-5438V0034N01A06]
[4]   Trends in Publication of Spirituality/Religiosity Articles in Critical Care Populations [J].
Berg, Gina M. ;
Crowe, Robin E. ;
Wong, Bryant ;
Siebert, Jane .
JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2010, 49 (03) :333-336
[5]   Doctors discussing religion and spirituality: A systematic literature review [J].
Best, Megan ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Olver, Ian .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 30 (04) :327-337
[6]   Do patients want doctors to talk about spirituality? A systematic literature review [J].
Best, Megan ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Olver, Ian .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (11) :1320-1328
[7]  
Borges RB, 2021, Clinical & Biomedical Research, DOI [10.22491/2357-9730.109542, 10.22491/2357-9730.109542]
[8]  
Camelo Silvia Helena Henriques, 2013, Texto contexto - enferm., V22, P552
[9]   Item Response Theory [J].
Candido de Araujo, Eutalia Aparecida ;
de Andrade, Dalton Francisco ;
Vincenzi Bortolotti, Silvana Ligia .
REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2009, 43 :1000-1008
[10]  
Castillo R, 2022, Revista da ANPEGE, DOI [10.5418/ra2022.v18i36.16303, 10.5418/ra2022.v18i36.16303, DOI 10.5418/RA2022.V18I36.16303]