Radiation-Belt Dropouts: Relationship With Geomagnetic Storms and MeV Precipitation

被引：0

作者：

Freund, Domenique ^{[1
]}

Blum, Lauren ^{[1
]}

Huang, Jinbei ^{[2
]}

Vidal-Luengo, Sergio ^{[1
]}

Bruno, Alessandro ^{[3
,4
]}

Kataoka, Ryuho ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Lab Atmospher & Space Phys, Boulder, CO 80303 USA

[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Morgantown, WV USA

[3] NASA, Heliophys Sci Div, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA

[4] Catholic Univ Amer, Dept Phys, Washington, DC USA

[5] Natl Inst Polar Res, Tokyo, Japan

来源：

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2025年 / 52卷 / 04期

基金：

美国国家航空航天局;

关键词：

dropout; precipitation; radiation belts; MeV electrons; van allen probe; CALET; SOLAR-WIND; RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS; MAGNETOSPHERE; SPACECRAFT; ANOMALIES; PARTICLE; FLUXES; INNER;

D O I：

10.1029/2024GL113660

中图分类号：

P [天文学、地球科学];

学科分类号：

07 ;

摘要：

To better understand rapid radiation belt losses, this statistical study examines dropouts, defined as a phase-space density (PSD) decrease by a factor of >= 5 ${\ge} 5$ within 8 hr. The relationship between dropouts, storm parameters, solar-wind drivers, geomagnetic indices, and MeV electron precipitation is analyzed. Four years of data from the Van Allen Probes, measuring electron density, the CALorimetric Electron Telescope on the International Space Station, measuring MeV electron precipitation, and solar-wind/magnetic indices from the OMNI dataset are utilized. Our investigation reveals that electron loss in PSD increases with disturbance intensity. However, about one-third of dropouts occur during small geomagnetic disturbance periods, some involving precipitation, while approximately 40% of storms do not lead to dropouts. Superposed epoch analysis identifies solar-wind density and dynamic pressure as the main dropout drivers, while precipitation becomes more likely with higher trapped electron flux and stronger substorms. Dropouts do not require a negative southward magnetic field component.

引用

页数：11