3D Freehand Ultrasound using Visual Inertial and Deep Inertial Odometry for Measuring Patellar Tracking

被引:0
作者
Buchanan, Russell [1 ]
Tu, S. Jack [2 ]
Camurri, Marco [3 ]
Mellon, Stephen J. [2 ]
Fallon, Maurice [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Percept Act & Behav, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Oxford, NDORMS, Oxford, England
[3] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Engn, Bolzano, Italy
[4] Univ Oxford, Oxford Robot Inst, Oxford, England
来源
2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND APPLICATIONS, MEMEA 2024 | 2024年
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
3D freehand ultrasound; Deep Learning; Motion estimation; Inertial measurement unit; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1109/MEMEA60663.2024.10596905
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) issues affect one in four people, with 20% experiencing chronic knee pain despite treatment. Poor outcomes and pain after knee replacement surgery are often linked to patellar mal-tracking. Traditional imaging methods like CT and MRI face challenges, including cost and metal artefacts, and there's currently no ideal way to observe joint motion without issues such as soft tissue artefacts or radiation exposure. A new system to monitor joint motion could significantly improve understanding of PFJ dynamics, aiding in better patient care and outcomes. Combining 2D ultrasound with motion tracking for 3D reconstruction of the joint using semantic segmentation and position registration can be a solution. However, the need for expensive external infrastructure to estimate the trajectories of the scanner remains the main limitation to implementing 3D bone reconstruction from handheld ultrasound scanning clinically. We proposed the Visual-Inertial Odometry (VIO) and the deep learning-based inertial-only odometry methods as alternatives to motion capture for tracking a handheld ultrasound scanner. The 3D reconstruction generated by these methods has demonstrated potential for assessing the PFJ and for further measurements from free-hand ultrasound scans. The results show that the VIO method performs as well as the motion capture method, with average reconstruction errors of 1.25mm and 1.21mm, respectively. The VIO method is the first infrastructure-free method for 3D reconstruction of bone from wireless handheld ultrasound scanning with an accuracy comparable to methods that require external infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Barfoot T.D., 2017, State estimation for robotics
  • [2] Tibio-femoral and patello-femoral joint kinematics during navigated total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing
    Belvedere, C.
    Ensini, A.
    Leardini, A.
    Dedda, V.
    Feliciangeli, A.
    Cenni, F.
    Timoncini, A.
    Barbadoro, P.
    Giannini, S.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (08) : 1719 - 1727
  • [3] Buchanan R, 2021, PR MACH LEARN RES, V164, P1575
  • [4] Chen CH, 2018, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P6468
  • [5] Dellaert F., 2012, Tech. Rep. GT-RIMCP&R2012-002
  • [6] On-Manifold Preintegration for Real-Time Visual-Inertial Odometry
    Forster, Christian
    Carlone, Luca
    Dellaert, Frank
    Scaramuzza, Davide
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2017, 33 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [7] Sensorless freehand 3D ultrasound in real tissue: Speckle decorrelation without fully developed speckle
    Gee, AH
    Housden, RJ
    Hassenpflug, P
    Treece, GM
    Prager, RW
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2006, 10 (02) : 137 - 149
  • [8] Automatic Bone Segmentation in Ultrasound Images Using Local Phase Features and Dynamic Programming
    Jia, R.
    Mellon, S. J.
    Hansjee, S.
    Monk, A. P.
    Murray, D. W.
    Noble, J. A.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2016, : 1005 - 1008
  • [9] CAT & MAUS: A novel system for true dynamic motion measurement of underlying bony structures with compensation for soft tissue movement
    Jia, Rui
    Monk, Paul
    Murray, David
    Noble, J. Alison
    Mellon, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2017, 62 : 156 - 164
  • [10] Kazhdan M., 2006, P EUR S GEOM PROC, P61, DOI [10.5555/1281957.1281965, DOI 10.2312/SGP/SGP06/061-070]