Psychometric Properties of the Flourish Index and the Secure Flourish Index in Healthcare Settings

被引:0
作者
Liu, Xitao [1 ]
Falco, Christopher [1 ]
Guldner, Gregory [2 ]
Siegel, Jason T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Grad Univ, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
[2] HCA Healthcare, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
Flourish Index; Secure Flourish Index; factor analysis; resident physicians; flourishing; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1177/10731911241310312
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research on the construct of flourishing spans many fields of study. This study extends previous work by VanderWeele by investigating the measurement of flourishing, focusing on the structure and convergent validity of the Flourish Index (FI) and the Secure Flourish Index (SFI) within a national, multi-site sample of resident physicians. Through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFAs and CFAs), we assessed whether the FI and the SFI aligned with the theoretical flourishing models that VanderWeele suggested. We examined the convergent validity of both indices by testing whether they exhibited expected correlations with six different scales. The results of factor analyses and scale validation showed that data collected by the FI and the SFI fit the structural model of flourishing proposed by VanderWeele. Although prior studies reliably indicate that CFA results align with VanderWeele's model, this is a rare study where the EFA results also demonstrated a structure that aligns with his framework. Both scales exhibited strong convergent validity, producing data correlated with all six measures in the predicted directions. Although convergent validity has been previously shown, this study replicated and expanded evidence of the construct validity of data provided by the FI and the SFI.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Validation of the French Versions of the Flourish Index and the Secure Flourish Index
    Bachmann, A. Oulevey
    Jubin, J.
    Pasquier, J.
    Dos Santos, O. Portela
    Villegas-Frei, M. Guzman
    Bucher, C. Ortoleva
    [J]. COGENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [2] Billings Martha E, 2011, J Grad Med Educ, V3, P503, DOI 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00044.1
  • [3] Butler J., 2016, International Journal of Wellbeing, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.5502/IJW.V6I3.526
  • [4] A GLOBAL MEASURE OF PERCEIVED STRESS
    COHEN, S
    KAMARCK, T
    MERMELSTEIN, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1983, 24 (04) : 385 - 396
  • [5] New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings
    Diener, Ed
    Wirtz, Derrick
    Tov, William
    Kim-Prieto, Chu
    Choi, Dong-won
    Oishi, Shigehiro
    Biswas-Diener, Robert
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2010, 97 (02) : 143 - 156
  • [6] Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams
    Edmondson, A
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1999, 44 (02) : 350 - 383
  • [7] Fu Y., 2022, Doctoral dissertation
  • [8] The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement
    Gagné, M
    [J]. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2003, 27 (03) : 199 - 223
  • [9] Hooper D., 2008, ELECT J BUSINESS RES, V6, P53, DOI DOI 10.21427/D7CF7R
  • [10] Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being
    Huppert, Felicia A.
    So, Timothy T. C.
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2013, 110 (03) : 837 - 861