THE LOCAL SUBTRACTION APPROACH FOR EEG AND MEG FORWARD MODELING

被引:0
|
作者
Hoeltershinken, Malte b. [1 ]
Lange, Pia [1 ,2 ]
Erdbruegger, Tim [1 ]
Buschermoehle, Yvonne [1 ,3 ]
Wallois, Fabrice [4 ,5 ]
Ii, Alena buyx [6 ]
Pursiainen, Sampsa [7 ]
Vorwerk, Johannes [8 ,9 ]
Engwer, Christian [10 ]
Wolters, Carsten h. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Inst Biomagnetism & Bio signal Anal, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Inst Med Informat, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Munster, Otto Creutzfeldt Ctr Cognit & Behav Neurosci, Munster, Germany
[4] Jules Verne Univ Picardi, INSERM, Res Grp Multimo dal Anal Brain Funct, U1105, Amiens, France
[5] CHU Picardie, Pediat Funct Explorat Nervous Syst Dept, Amiens, France
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Hist & Eth Med, Munich, Germany
[7] Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Comp Sci Unit, Tampere, Finland
[8] Private Univ Hlth Sci, Inst Elect & Biomed Engn, Med Informat & Technol, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[9] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Mechatron, Innsbruck, Austria
[10] Univ Munster, Fac Math & Comp Sci, Munster, Germany
来源
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING | 2025年 / 47卷 / 01期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
EEG; MEG; source analysis; finite element method; source modeling; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; CURRENT DIPOLE; IMPLEMENTATION; SENSITIVITY; PARALLEL;
D O I
10.1137/23M1582874
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In FEM-based electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) source analysis, the subtraction approach has been proposed to simulate sensor measurements generated by neural activity. While this approach possesses a rigorous foundation and produces accurate results, its major downside is that it is computationally prohibitively expensive in practical applications. To overcome this, we developed a new approach, called the local subtraction approach. This approach is designed to preserve the mathematical foundation of the subtraction approach, while also leading to sparse right-hand sides in the FEM formulation, making it efficiently computable. We achieve this by introducing a cut-off into the subtraction, restricting its influence to the immediate neighborhood of the source. We perform validation in multilayer sphere models where analytical solutions exist. There, we demonstrate that the local subtraction approach is vastly more efficient than the subtraction approach. Moreover, we find that for the EEG forward problem, the local subtraction approach is less dependent on the global structure of the FEM mesh when compared to the subtraction approach. Additionally, we show the local subtraction approach to rival, and in many cases even surpass, the other investigated approaches in terms of accuracy. For the MEG forward problem, we show the local subtraction approach and the subtraction approach to produce highly accurate approximations of the volume currents close to the source. The local subtraction approach thus reduces the computational cost of the subtraction approach to an extent that makes it usable in practical applications without sacrificing the rigorousness and accuracy the subtraction approach is known for.
引用
收藏
页码:B160 / B189
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measures of spatial similarity and response magnitude in MEG and scalp EEG
    Tian, Xing
    Huber, David E.
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2008, 20 (03) : 131 - 141
  • [42] A review of EEG and MEG for brainnetome research
    Zhang, Xin
    Lei, Xu
    Wu, Ting
    Jiang, Tianzi
    COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS, 2014, 8 (02) : 87 - 98
  • [43] A review of EEG and MEG for brainnetome research
    Xin Zhang
    Xu Lei
    Ting Wu
    Tianzi Jiang
    Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2014, 8 : 87 - 98
  • [44] Source Connectivity Analysis With MEG and EEG
    Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs
    Gross, Joachim
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2009, 30 (06) : 1857 - 1865
  • [45] Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG
    van den Broek, SP
    Reinders, F
    Donderwinkel, M
    Peters, MJ
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 106 (06): : 522 - 534
  • [46] Fast EEG/MEG BEM-based forward problem solution for high-resolution head models
    Wartman, William A.
    Nunez, Guillermo
    Qi, Zhen
    Haueisen, Jens
    Maess, Burkhard
    Knoesche, Thomas R.
    Weise, Konstantin
    Noetscher, Gregory M.
    Raij, Tommi
    Makaroff, Sergey N.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2025, 306
  • [47] MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Brainstorm
    Tadel, Francois
    Bock, Elizabeth
    Niso, Guiomar
    Mosher, John C.
    Cousineau, Martin
    Pantazis, Dimitrios
    Leahy, Richard M.
    Baillet, Sylvain
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [48] Numerical mathematics of the subtraction method for the modeling of a current dipole in EEG source reconstruction using finite element head models
    Wolters, C. H.
    Koestler, H.
    Moeller, C.
    Haerdtlein, J.
    Grasedyck, L.
    Hackbusch, W.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2007, 30 (01): : 24 - 45
  • [49] Dynamical Network Models From EEG and MEG for Epilepsy Surgery-A Quantitative Approach
    Cao, Miao
    Vogrin, Simon J.
    Peterson, Andre D. H.
    Woods, William
    Cook, Mark J.
    Plummer, Chris
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [50] A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem
    Baillet, S
    Garnero, L
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 44 (05) : 374 - 385